首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Reform and community care: has de-institutionalisation delivered for people with intellectual disability?
【24h】

Reform and community care: has de-institutionalisation delivered for people with intellectual disability?

机译:改革和社区护理:去机构化是否为智障人士带来了收益?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BURRELL B and TRIP H. Nursing Inquiry 2011; 18: 174-183 Reform and community care: has de-institutionalisation delivered for people with intellectual disability? In this paper we provide a post structural analysis of the theoretical shifts informing changes to service delivery over the past 150 years in relation to people with intellectual disability. We utilise the New Zealand experience of reform as it reflected global knowledge at any given period. Firstly, we address the historical modes of treatment and care, with reference to the eugenics movement, the concepts informing 'Prisons of protection' and moral treatment. Secondly the paper traces reforms commencing in the 1960s where changes from institutional care to community care were informed by humanistic ideals, a key driver being the concept of normalisation. Theorists offered competing discourses that formed the bases of arguments for the status quo whilst resistant voices advocated change. Covering such significant changes leads us to assess the state of de-institutionalisation' as it stands today and how it may be perceived in the future. We assert that Foucault's genealogical approach provides analytic tools to uncover the dynamics of changing attitudes and approaches to service delivery. In applying a Foucauldian lens to the trajectory of reforms concerning institutionalisation to de-institutionalisation we question whether a form of re-institutionalisation may be occurring.
机译:BURRELL B和TRIP H.2011年护理咨询; 18:174-183改革和社区护理:去机构化是否为智障人士带来了收益?在本文中,我们提供了对理论变化的后结构分析,以了解过去150年来与智障人士相关的服务提供的变化。我们利用新西兰的改革经验,因为它可以反映任何特定时期的全球知识。首先,我们参照优生运动,告知“保护监狱”的概念和道德待遇,探讨治疗和护理的历史模式。其次,本文追溯了始于1960年代的改革,其中从机构照护到社区照护的转变都受到了人文主义理想的启发,其中一个关键推动因素是规范化的概念。理论家提供了相互竞争的话语,这些话语构成了维持现状的论据基础,而反抗的声音则提倡变革。涵盖如此重大的变化使我们评估了当今的非制度化状态,以及未来的去向。我们断言福柯的家谱方法提供了分析工具,以揭示不断变化的态度和服务交付方法的动态。在将福柯主义的镜头应用于从制度化到非制度化的改革轨迹时,我们质疑是否可能发生某种形式的重新制度化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号