首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >Differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump and blood flow measured by an ultrasonic sensor.
【24h】

Differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump and blood flow measured by an ultrasonic sensor.

机译:血液透析血液辊泵指示的血流与超声传感器测量的血流之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIM: The ultrasonic transit time is currently the best method for measuring the blood flow rate in the extracorporeal hemodialysis circuit. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences between blood flow as indicated by the hemodialysis blood roller pump (prescribed blood flow) and by an ultrasonic flowmeter (delivered blood flow). METHODS: The ultrasonic blood flow was measured in 20 patients on chronic hemodialysis who were dialyzed through an arteriovenous fistula. During each dialysis session the ultrasonic blood flow was measured at three different blood roller pump flow rates (300, 350, and 400 ml/min). In order to analyze the influence of inflow and outflow pressures on blood flow, this study was conducted during nine consecutive dialysis sessions during which needles of different sizes were used. RESULTS: The ultrasonic flow was always lower than indicated by the blood roller pump: 265+/-12, 304+/-15, and 341+/- 19 ml/min for blood roller pump flow rates of 300, 350, and 400 ml/min, respectively (variability: -11.6, -13.1, and -14.8%, respectively). An univariate regression analysis showed that the reduction in flow recorded ultrasonically correlated with both venous blood line pressure (r = -0.2679, p<0.001) and negative arterial blood line pressure (r = 0. 6773, p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, only the arterial blood line pressure has a predictive value. When all measurements were grouped by arterial blood line pressure ranges, the variability between ultrasonic blood flow and blood roller pump flow was found to be similar in those groups with the same arterial blood line pressure, regardless of the blood roller pump flow rate. CONCLUSIONS: The blood flow indicated by the dialysis blood roller pump is always greater than the delivered blood flow, and this difference is in turn conditioned by the negative pressure induced by the blood roller pump in the arterial blood line. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
机译:背景/目的:超声渡越时间是目前测量体外血液透析回路中血流速度的最佳方法。这项研究的目的是分析血液透析血辊泵(规定的血流量)和超声流量计(输送的血流量)指示的血流量之间的差异。方法:通过动静脉瘘透析的20例慢性血液透析患者的超声血流进行了测量。在每次透析过程中,以三种不同的血辊泵流速(300、350和400 ml / min)测量超声血流。为了分析流入和流出压力对血流的影响,在连续九次透析期间使用了不同尺寸的针头进行了这项研究。结果:对于300、350和400的血辊泵流速,超声波流量始终低于血辊泵指示的值:265 +/- 12、304 +/- 15和341 +/- 19 ml / min ml / min(变异性分别为-11.6,-13.1和-14.8%)。单因素回归分析表明,超声记录的血流减少与静脉血压(r = -0.2679,p <0.001)和负动脉血压(r = 0. 6773,p <0.001)相关。通过多变量分析,仅动脉血压具有预测价值。当将所有测量值按动脉血压范围进行分组时,发现在那些具有相同动脉血压的组中,超声波血流和血辊泵流量之间的变化相似,而与血辊泵流量无关。结论:透析血辊泵所指示的血流总是大于所输送的血流,而这种差异又是由动脉血管中的血辊泵引起的负压来调节的。版权所有2000 S. Karger AG,巴塞尔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号