首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Tumor blood flow measured by PET dynamic imaging of first-pass 18F-FDG uptake: a comparison with 15O-labeled water-measured blood flow.
【24h】

Tumor blood flow measured by PET dynamic imaging of first-pass 18F-FDG uptake: a comparison with 15O-labeled water-measured blood flow.

机译:通过PET动态成像对首过18F-FDG摄取进行PET动态成像测量的肿瘤血流量:与15O标记的水测量血流量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PET molecular imaging of 15O-labeled water is the gold standard for measuring blood flow in humans. However, this requires an on-site cyclotron to produce the short-lived 15O tracer, which is cost-prohibitive for most clinical PET centers. The purpose of this study was to determine if the early uptake of 18F-FDG could be used to measure regional blood flow in tumors in the absence of 15O-water. METHODS: PET scans were obtained in patients being evaluated for tumor perfusion and glucose metabolism in a phase I dose-escalating protocol for endostatin, a novel antiangiogenic agent. A 2-min perfusion scan was performed with a bolus injection of 2,220 MBq (60 mCi) of 15O-water, which was followed by a 370-MBq (10 mCi) dose of 18F-FDG. Four sequential scans of 18F-FDG uptake were acquired, consisting of an early 2-min uptake scan-or first-pass scan-and 3 sequential 15-min late 18F-FDG uptake scans. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on 2 or more tumor sites and on back muscle, as a control ROI, for each patient. Arterial blood concentration was derived from the PET scans by drawing an ROI over a large artery in the field of view. Blood flow was computed with a simple 1-compartment blood flow model using the first 2 min of data after injection. RESULTS: Blood flow estimated from the early uptake of 18F-FDG was linearly correlated with 15O-measured blood flow, with an intercept of 0.01, a slope of 0.86, and an R2 regression coefficient of 0.74 (r = 0.86). The 18F-FDG tumor extraction fraction relative to 15O-water averaged 0.86. A preliminary case study of a patient with prostate cancer confirms the utility of the first-pass 18F-FDG blood flow analysis in tumor diagnosis. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the first-pass uptake of 18F-FDG may provide an estimate of perfusion in a tumor within the limitations of incomplete extraction of 18F-FDG compared with 15O-water.
机译:15O标记水的PET分子成像是测量人体血流的金标准。但是,这需要现场回旋加速器来生产寿命短的15O示踪剂,这对于大多数临床PET中心来说是成本高昂的。这项研究的目的是确定在没有15O水的情况下,是否可以早期摄取18F-FDG来测量肿瘤的局部血流。方法:对患者进行PET扫描,评估患者在I期剂量递增方案新型血管生成抑制素内皮抑素中的肿瘤灌注和葡萄糖代谢情况。推注2,220 MBq(60 mCi)的15O水进行2分钟的灌注扫描,然后注入370 MBq(10 mCi)的18F-FDG。进行了四次连续的18F-FDG摄取扫描,包括2分钟的早期摄取扫描或首过扫描和3次连续的15分钟的18F-FDG摄取扫描。对于每个患者,在2个或更多肿瘤部位和背部肌肉上绘制感兴趣区域(ROI)。通过在视野内绘制一条大动脉上的ROI,从PET扫描得出动脉血浓度。使用注射后的前2分钟数据,通过简单的1室血流模型计算血流。结果:从18F-FDG的早期摄取估计的血流量与15O测量的血流量呈线性相关,截距为0.01,斜率为0.86,R2回归系数为0.74(r = 0.86)。相对于15 O-水的18 F-FDG肿瘤提取率平均为0.86。对前列腺癌患者的初步病例研究证实了首过18F-FDG血流分析在肿瘤诊断中的实用性。结论:这些结果表明,与15O水相比,在18F-FDG提取不完全的局限性下,18F-FDG的首过摄取可提供肿瘤灌注的估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号