首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: Validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles
【24h】

Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: Validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles

机译:研究生医学教育中有效临床教学的评估和反馈:结合CanMEDS角色的评估工具的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Providing clinical teachers in postgraduate medical education with feedback about their teaching skills is a powerful tool to improve clinical teaching. A systematic review showed that available instruments do not comprehensively cover all domains of clinical teaching. We developed and empirically test a comprehensive instrument for assessing clinical teachers in the setting of workplace learning and linked to the CanMEDS roles. Methods: In a Delphi study, the content validity of a preliminary instrument with 88 items was studied, leading to the construction of the EFFECT (evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching) instrument. The response process was explored in a pilot test and focus group research with 18 residents of 6 different disciplines. A confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and reliability analyses were performed on 407 evaluations of 117 supervisors, collected in 3 medical disciplines (paediatrics, pulmonary diseases and surgery) of 6 departments in 4 different hospitals. Results: CFA yielded an 11 factor model with a good to excellent fit and internal consistencies ranged from 0.740 to 0.940 per domain; 7 items could be deleted. Conclusion: The model of workplace learning showed to be a useful framework for developing EFFECT, which incorporates the CanMEDS competencies and proved to be valid and reliable.
机译:背景:向研究生医学教育中的临床教师提供有关其教学技能的反馈,是改善临床教学的强大工具。一项系统的审查表明,可用的工具并未全面涵盖临床教学的所有领域。我们开发并通过经验测试了一种综合工具,用于评估临床教师在职场学习环境中的表现,并与CanMEDS角色相关联。方法:在Delphi研究中,研究了88项初步仪器的内容有效性,从而构建了EFFECT(有效临床教学的评估和反馈)仪器。在试点测试和焦点小组研究中探索了响应过程,该研究与来自6个不同学科的18位居民进行了比较。对来自4家不同医院的6个部门的3个医学学科(儿科,肺病和外科)的117位主管进行407次评估,进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)和可靠性分析。结果:CFA产生了一个11因子模型,具有良好到极好的拟合度,并且内部一致性每个域的范围从0.740到0.940。 7个项目可以删除。结论:工作场所学习模型被证明是发展EFFECT的有用框架,它融合了CanMEDS的能力并且被证明是有效和可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号