首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >Debate: Substitution of generic drugs in epilepsy: is there cause for concern?
【24h】

Debate: Substitution of generic drugs in epilepsy: is there cause for concern?

机译:辩论:将通用药物替代为癫痫药:是否值得关注?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The role of generic drugs in both the US and global marketplace has been steadily increasing over the last few years. Although generic drugs clearly represent an important economic alternative for many patients, there are reasons for concern in certain disease states. Recently, the substitution of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy has gained increased attention. Concerns over potential therapeutic inequivalence has prompted many clinicians to question current regulatory requirements for both establishing bioequivalence, as well as product substitution. The objective of this article is to present arguments both for and against the use of generic drugs and practice of generic substitution in patients with epilepsy. Regulatory requirements, pharmacokinetic methodology, and biopharmaceutical considerations are discussed.
机译:在过去的几年中,仿制药在美国和全球市场中的作用一直在稳步增长。尽管对于许多患者而言,仿制药显然是一种重要的经济替代方案,但在某些疾病状态中仍存在令人担忧的原因。最近,在癫痫患者中抗癫痫药的替代已引起越来越多的关注。对潜在治疗不平等的担忧促使许多临床医生质疑建立生物等效性以及产品替代的当前监管要求。本文的目的是提出支持和反对在癫痫患者中使用仿制药和反对使用仿制药的观点。讨论了法规要求,药代动力学方法和生物制药注意事项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号