首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Plastic Surgery >Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of flap complication rates and donor-site morbidity.
【24h】

Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of flap complication rates and donor-site morbidity.

机译:腹部游离腹直肌肌皮和上腹深部下腹穿孔皮瓣用于乳房重建:皮瓣并发症发生率和供体部位发病率的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps represent increasingly popular options for breast reconstruction. Although several retrospective, small-scale studies comparing these flaps have been published, most have failed to find a significant difference in flap complication rates or donor-site morbidity. We systematically reviewed the current literature, and subsequently pooled and analyzed data from included studies. Included studies reported flap complications and/or donor site morbidities for both flap types. Eight studies met the inclusionary criteria. For flap complications, there was a statistically significant difference between deep inferior epigastric perforator and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in fat necrosis rates (25.5 +/- 0.49 vs. 11.3% +/- 0.41%, P < 0.001) and total necrosis rates (4.15 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.59% +/- 0.08%, P = 0.044). Partial necrosis rates were not statistically significant (3.54 +/- 0.07 vs. 1.60% +/- 0.07%, P = 0.057). For donor-site morbidity, there was no statistically significant difference in abdominal bulge (8.07 +/- 0.23 vs. 11.25% +/- 0.29%, P = 0.28). Multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further investigate differences between these flap options.
机译:腹横肌直肌游离和上腹下腹穿孔较深,代表了乳房重建的越来越多的选择。尽管已经发表了一些比较这些皮瓣的回顾性小规模研究,但大多数研究未能发现皮瓣并发症发生率或供体部位发病率有显着差异。我们系统地回顾了当前文献,随后汇总并分析了纳入研究的数据。包括在内的研究报告了两种皮瓣类型的皮瓣并发症和/或供体部位发病率。八项研究符合纳入标准。对于皮瓣并发症,上腹下腹穿孔器和腹直肌横肌游离皮瓣在脂肪坏死率(25.5 +/- 0.49 vs. 11.3%+/- 0.41%,P <0.001)和总坏死率之间有统计学差异(4.15 +/- 0.08与1.59%+/- 0.08%,P = 0.044)。部分坏死率无统计学意义(3.54 +/- 0.07对1.60%+/- 0.07%,P = 0.057)。对于供体部位的发病率,腹部隆起没有统计学上的显着差异(8.07 +/- 0.23对11.25%+/- 0.29%,P = 0.28)。需要进行多中心前瞻性研究,以进一步研究这些皮瓣选项之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号