...
【24h】

Feedback controversy stops here.

机译:反馈争议到此为止。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this issue of Blood, Kravtsov and colleagues provide conclusive evidence for factor XII-independent activation of factor XI in plasma. Even though nearly 20 years have passed since thrombin-mediated factor (f)XI activation was first described, the relevance of this feedback activation for coagulation remains controversial. In the activated partial thromboplastin time, fXI becomes activated by fXIIa due to contact activation-initiated coagulation. However, the relevance of fXIIa-mediated fXI activation in hemostasis is questionable because individuals with fXII deficiency do not show signs of a bleeding tendency. In contrast, fXI deficiency is associated with a mild to moderate bleeding tendency, especially in tissues with a high local fibrinolytic activity. Alternative pathways for activation of fXI should therefore exist. Besides fXIIa, thrombin, meizothrombin, and fXIa (auto-activation) were shown to activate fXI. Upon initiation of coagulation with low concentrations of tissue factor, the presence of fXI contributed to (further) thrombin generation. The extra generation of thrombin via this pathway resulted in clot resistance to fibrino-lysis, providing an explanation for the bleeding tendency of fXI-deficient individuals.3 Although feedback activation in coagulation has been described by many laboratories using different techniques, skepticism about its relevance remained. The most recent study that tried to disprove feedback activation of fXI was a study by Pedicord and colleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This study could not demonstrate fXIa generation when thrombin or tissue factor was added to plasma. As with all scientific findings, it is much more difficult to prove the absence of an effect than the presence thereof. Also, the technology that was used in this study was clearly inferior compared with earlier publications. However, the authors justifiably concluded that the reagents used in (some of) the previous studies may have contained traces of fXIa that could have led to the erroneous conclusion that fXI activation occurred independent of fXII. Instead of ignoring the conclusions of this paper, Kravtsov et al decide to do one better and demonstrate feedback activation of fXI in plasma. With their report in this issue of Blood, they convincingly succeed.
机译:在本期《血液》中,克拉夫佐夫及其同事为血浆中不依赖因子XII的因子XI活化提供了确凿的证据。尽管自从首次描述凝血酶介导的因子(f)XI激活以来已经过去了近20年,但这种反馈激活与凝血的相关性仍存在争议。在活化的部分凝血活酶时间内,由于接触活化引发的凝血作用,fXI被fXIIa活化。但是,fXIIa介导的fXI激活在止血中的相关性值得怀疑,因为fXII缺乏的个体没有显示出出血倾向的迹象。相反,fXI缺乏与轻度至中度的出血倾向有关,尤其是在具有高局部纤溶活性的组织中。因此,应该存在激活fXI的替代途径。除fXIIa之外,凝血酶,meizothrombin和fXIa(自动激活)也可激活fXI。在以低浓度的组织因子开始凝血后,fXI的存在有助于(进一步)凝血酶的产生。通过这种途径产生的额外凝血酶导致血栓对纤维蛋白溶解的抗性,为fXI缺陷型个体的出血趋势提供了解释。3尽管许多实验室已经使用不同的技术描述了凝血中的反馈激活,但对其相关性持怀疑态度保持。 Pedicord及其同事在《美国国家科学院院刊》上进行的一项最新研究试图反驳fXI的反馈激活。当凝血酶或组织因子添加到血浆中时,该研究不能证明fXIa的产生。与所有科学发现一样,要证明没有效果要比存在效果困难得多。而且,与以前的出版物相比,本研究中使用的技术明显逊色。然而,作者有理由得出结论,先前研究(某些)中使用的试剂可能含有fXIa的痕迹,这可能导致fXI活化独立于fXII的错误结论。 Kravtsov等人没有忽略本文的结论,而是决定做得更好,并证明血浆中fXI的反馈激活。他们在本期《血液》中的报道令人信服地取得了成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号