...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Validation of clinical scores predicting severe acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.
【24h】

Validation of clinical scores predicting severe acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

机译:验证心脏手术后严重急性肾损伤的临床评分的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is associated strongly with adverse patient outcomes. Recently, 3 predictive risk models for RRT have been developed. The aims of our study are to validate the predictive scoring models for patients requiring postoperative RRT and test applicability to the broader spectrum of patients with postoperative severe AKI. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 12,096 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 2000 through 2007. INDEX TEST: Cleveland Clinic score, Mehta score, and Simplified Renal Index (SRI) score. REFERENCE TEST OR OUTCOME: Incidence of postoperative RRT or composite outcome of severe AKI, defined as serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL, and a 2-fold increase compared with the preoperative baseline creatinine level or RRT. RESULTS: RRT was used in 254 (2.1%) patients, whereas severe AKI was present in 467 (3.9%). Discrimination for the prediction of RRT and severe AKI was good for all scoring models measured using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs): 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.88) for RRT and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83) for severe AKI using the Cleveland score, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80) using the Mehta score, and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77-0.82) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.77) using the SRI score. The Cleveland score and Mehta score consistently showed significantly better discrimination compared with the SRI score (P < 0.001). Despite lower AUROCs for the prediction of severe AKI, the Cleveland score AUROC was still >0.80. The Mehta score is applicable in only a subgroup of patients. LIMITATIONS: Single-center retrospective cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: The Cleveland scoring system offers the best discriminative value to predict postoperative RRT and covers most patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It also can be used for prediction of the composite end point of severe AKI, which enables broader application to patients at risk of postoperative kidney dysfunction.
机译:背景:进行心脏手术的患者需要进行肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的急性肾损伤(AKI)与患者不良的预后密切相关。最近,已经开发了3种RRT的预测风险模型。我们研究的目的是验证需要术后RRT的患者的预测评分模型,并测试其对术后严重AKI患者的广泛适用性。研究设计:诊断测试研究。地点和参与者:2000年至2007年,在明尼苏达州罗彻斯特市梅奥诊所进行了心脏外科手术并接受心肺转流术的12,096例患者。指标测试:克利夫兰诊所评分,Mehta评分和简化肾脏指数(SRI)评分。参考测试或结果:术后RRT或严重AKI的复合结果的发生率定义为血清肌酐水平> 2.0 mg / dL,与术前基线肌酐水平或RRT相比增加2倍。结果:254(2.1%)患者使用了RRT,而467(3.9%)患者中存在严重的AKI。对于使用在接收器工作特征曲线(AUROC)下的面积进行测量的所有评分模型,对RRT和严重AKI的预测都很好:RRT为0.86(95%CI,0.84-0.88)和0.81(95%CI,0.79-0.83) )对于严重AKI,使用克利夫兰评分,使用Mehta评分为0.81(95%CI,0.78-0.86)和0.76(95%CI,0.73-0.80),以及0.79(95%CI,0.77-0.82)和0.75(95 %CI,0.72-0.77)。与SRI评分相比,克利夫兰评分和Mehta评分始终显示出明显更好的辨别力(P <0.001)。尽管预测严重AKI的AUROC较低,但克利夫兰评分AUROC仍> 0.80。 Mehta评分仅适用于部分患者。局限性:单中心回顾性队列研究。结论:克利夫兰评分系统可提供最佳判别价值,以预测术后RRT,并涵盖大多数接受心脏手术的患者。它也可以用于预测严重AKI的复合终点,从而可以更广泛地应用于有术后肾功能不全风险的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号