...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Behavior >Exploring secondary students' conceptualization of functions in three curriculum contexts
【24h】

Exploring secondary students' conceptualization of functions in three curriculum contexts

机译:在三个课程背景下探索次要学生的函数概念化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An important goal in school mathematics is for students to develop a comprehensive and multifaceted conceptualization of function. Yet studies have found that undergraduate students often hold limited concept images for function. This study investigated 240 middle and upper secondary (15- to 18-year-old) students' conceptualizations of function at different year levels (Years 9 to 12) to consider their conceptualizations relative to certain prior learning, as theorized by an epistemological model for concept development in mathematics. In this article we draw on data from students and their teachers in three Western national curriculum contexts (Israeli, English, and Australian) to explore possible relationships among students' exposure to the word 'function', familiarity with different examples of functions, and their conceptualizations of function. Eighty high-achieving students from each context, 20 per year level, were prompted to respond to several fictitious students' views on what a function is, and then to provide their own definition. The students' responses were analyzed for evidence of a dominant meaning and any contributing ideas, as well as the use of any specific examples or non-examples of function to illustrate or clarify their views. Twenty teachers also participated in the study. Analysis of curriculum content and the teachers' perspectives on their students led to our search for possible reasons for similarities and differences found among the responses.
机译:学校数学的一个重要目标是为学生制定全面和多方面的功能概念化。然而,研究发现,本科生经常持有有限的概念图像的功能。本研究调查了240名中高中(15至18岁)的学生在不同年级的功能概念化(第9至12年),以考虑其相对于某些事先学习的概念化,以认识论模型为理论化数学概念发展。在本文中,我们在三个西方国家课程背景(以色列,英语和澳大利亚)中汲取学生及其教师的数据,以探讨学生接触“功能”这个词,熟悉不同职能的关系,以及他们的功能的概念化。从每个上下文中的八十次高层学生,每年20级,迅速响应了几个虚构的学生对功能的看法,然后提供自己的定义。分析学生的回应,以证明主导意义和任何贡献的想法,以及使用任何具体例子或非职能的非例子来说明或澄清他们的观点。二十名教师也参加了这项研究。课程内容分析与教师对学生的观点导致我们寻求了响应中发现的相似之处和差异的可能原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号