首页> 外文期刊>Quality management in health care >Using Design Thinking to Improve Patient-Provider Communication in the Emergency Department
【24h】

Using Design Thinking to Improve Patient-Provider Communication in the Emergency Department

机译:利用设计思考改善急诊部门的患者提供商沟通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quality Issue: Emergency department overcrowding has been identified as a quality and patient safety concern. Initial Assessment: The need for a project focused on mitigating risk in the setting of overcrowding was identified. Choice of Solution: Design thinking is an improvement methodology that uses a process that prioritizes empathy for end users and is optimal for abstract problems. Implementation: The team leveraged design thinking to walk through a 5-step process. In the empathize phase, inputs were collected and safety themes identified. In the define phase, optimal communication was identified as the focus area of the project. During the ideate phase, the team looked both internally and externally to identify tactics that existed to improve communication. Next, the team prototyped different solutions. In the testing phase, 33 trainings with 289 clinicians were conducted. Evaluation: The evaluation of this program demonstrated that it was positively received by clinicians. Although only 72% of clinicians believed the course would be a valuable use of their time before taking it, 97% reported it was a valuable use of their time following completion ( P < .001). Precourse self-evaluation of knowledge, skill, and ability was high. Despite this, postcourse self-efficacy improved significantly in all 4 domains studied. Lessons Learned: Design thinking offers an agile method for process improvement that was ideal for our relatively abstract problem. Although likely not an optimal method for a problem that is well understood, design thinking holds promise for many of the increasingly patient-centered initiatives that are underway in health care.
机译:质量问题:紧急部门过度拥有被确定为质量和患者的安全问题。初步评估:确定了一项专注于在过度拥挤方面减轻风险的项目的需求。解决方案的选择:设计思维是一种改进方法,它使用了一个优先考虑Ends用户的进程的过程,并且对于抽象问题是最佳的。实施:团队利用设计思想走过5步流程。在同情阶段,收集输入并确定了安全主题。在定义阶段,最佳通信被识别为项目的焦点区域。在想法期间,团队在内部和外部看,以确定存在改善通信的策略。接下来,团队原型化了不同的解决方案。在测试阶段,进行了3​​3名临床医生的培训。评价:该计划的评估表明,临床医生积极接受。虽然只有72%的临床医生认为,在服用之前,课程将是一个宝贵的使用,97%报告了完成后的时间是有价值的使用(P <.001)。令人讨论的知识,技能和能力的自我评估很高。尽管如此,在研究的所有4个域中,过多的自我效能显着提高。经验教训:设计思维为流程改进提供了一个敏捷方法,这是我们相对抽象的问题的理想选择。虽然可能不是良好理解的问题的最佳方法,但是设计思维对于在医疗保健正在进行的许多日益患者中心的举措中拥有承诺。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quality management in health care》 |2020年第1期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs Aaronson White and Sonis and Ms Black) and Internal;

    Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs Aaronson White and Sonis and Ms Black) and Internal;

    Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs Aaronson White and Sonis and Ms Black) and Internal;

    Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs Aaronson White and Sonis and Ms Black) and Internal;

    Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs Aaronson White and Sonis and Ms Black) and Internal;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号