...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >TALK-TIME IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: DURATION OF PATIENT-PROVIDER CONVERSATIONS DURING AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISIT
【24h】

TALK-TIME IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: DURATION OF PATIENT-PROVIDER CONVERSATIONS DURING AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISIT

机译:紧急部门的通话时间:紧急部门访问期间患者与提供者的通话时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Analyses of patient flow through the emergency department (ED) typically focus on metrics such as wait time, total length of stay (LOS), or boarding time. Less is known about how much interaction a patient has with clinicians after being placed in a room, or what proportion of their in-room visit is also spent waiting. Objective: Our aim was to assess the proportion of time that a patient spent in conversation with providers during an ED visit. Methods: Seventy-four audio-taped encounters of patients with low-acuity diagnoses were analyzed. Recorded ED visits were edited to remove downtime. The proportion of time the patient spent in conversation with providers (talk-time) was calculated as follows: (talk-time = [edited audio time/{LOS - door-to-doctor time}]). Results: Participants were 46% male; mean age was 41 years (standard deviation 15.7 years). Median LOS was 126 min (interquartile range [IQR] 96 to 163 min), median time in a patient care area was 76 min (IQR 55 to 122 min). Median time in conversation with providers was 19 min (IQR 14 to 27 min), corresponding to a talk-time percentage of 24.9%(IQR 17.8%-35%). Multi-variable regression analysis revealed that patients with older age, longer visits, and those requiring a procedure had more talk-time: total talk-time = 13 s + 9 s x (total time in room in minutes) + 8 s x (years in age of patient) + 482 s x (procedural diagnosis). Conclusions: Approximately 75% of a patient's time in a care area is spent not interacting with providers. Although some of the time waiting is out of the providers' control (eg, awaiting imaging studies), this significant downtime represents an opportunity for both process improvement efforts and innovative patient-education efforts to make use of remaining downtime. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
机译:背景:通过急诊室(ED)的患者流分析通常着重于指标,例如等待时间,总住院时间(LOS)或登机时间。病人被放在房间后与临床医生进行了多少互动,或者他们在房间拜访中还花费了多少时间,人们所知甚少。目的:我们的目的是评估患者在急诊室就诊时与服务提供者交谈的时间比例。方法:分析74例低敏诊断患者的录音。编辑记录的急诊就诊,以消除停机时间。患者与服务提供者交谈所花费的时间比例(通话时间)计算如下:(通话时间= [编辑的音频时间/ {LOS-门诊时间}]。结果:参与者为46%的男性;平均年龄为41岁(标准差为15.7岁)。 LOS中位数为126分钟(四分位间距[IQR] 96至163分钟),患者护理区的中位时间为76分钟(IQR 55至122分钟)。与提供者交谈的中位时间为19分钟(IQR 14至27分钟),对应的通话时间百分比为24.9%(IQR 17.8%-35%)。多变量回归分析显示,年龄较大,就诊时间较长且需要进行手术的患者的谈话时间更长:总谈话时间= 13 s + 9 sx(以分钟计的房间总时间)+ 8 sx(年)。患者年龄)+ 482 sx(过程诊断)。结论:在护理区域中,约有75%的时间用于与服务提供者不进行互动。尽管有些等待时间超出了提供者的控制范围(例如,等待影像学检查),但这种重大停机时间为过程改进工作和创新的患者教育工作提供了利用剩余停机时间的机会。 (C)2014爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号