首页> 外文期刊>Science education >The tension between pattern-seeking and mechanistic reasoning in explanation construction: A case from Chinese elementary science classroom
【24h】

The tension between pattern-seeking and mechanistic reasoning in explanation construction: A case from Chinese elementary science classroom

机译:解释构建模式寻求机械推理的紧张局势:中国小学科学课堂案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Through analysis of a classroom lesson led by a decorated teacher, we illustrate how instructional practices favor students seeking empirical patterns at the expense of using mechanistic reasoning. In the lesson, when students spontaneously come up with hypothetical mechanisms to explain why a light bulb in an electric circuit does or does not light, the teacher, following the guidance of standardized curricula, redirects them toward pattern-seeking. We argue that this bias toward pattern-seeking in Chinese national standards and curricula, along with ambiguity in those documents on what an "explanation" is, sits in tension with students' productive abilities and propensities for engaging in mechanistic explanation. In discussion, we extend the argument to show a less severe but similar bias toward pattern-seeking in the United States' Next Generation Science Standards.
机译:通过分析由装饰教师领导的课堂课程,我们说明了教学实践如何利用学生以牺牲机制推理为代价寻求实证模式的学生。 在课程中,当学生自发地提出假设机制来解释为什么电路中的灯泡确实或不轻,老师在标准化课程的指导之后,将它们重定向到寻求模式。 我们认为,这一偏见在中国国家标准和课程中寻求模式,以及这些文件中的歧义,就“解释”是什么,符合学生的生产能力和从事机械解释的促进性的紧张局势。 在讨论中,我们扩展了争论,以显示在美国的下一代科学标准中的模式寻求不太严重但类似的偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号