首页> 外文期刊>Research in science education >Secondary School Students' Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning
【24h】

Secondary School Students' Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning

机译:中学生对科学的理解及其社会科学推理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research in socioscientific issue (SSI)-based interventions is relatively new (Sadler in Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41:513-536, 2004; Zeidler et al. in Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46:74-101, 2009), and there is a need for understanding more about the effects of SSI-based learning environments (Sadler in Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41:513-536, 2004). Lee and Witz (International Journal of Science Education 31:931-960, 2009) highlighted the need for detailed case studies that would focus on how students respond to teachers' practices of teaching SSI. This study presents case studies that investigated the development of secondary school students' science understanding and their socioscientific reasoning within SSI-based learning environments. A multiple case study with embedded units of analysis was implemented for this research because of the contextual differences for each case. The findings of the study revealed that students' understanding of science, including scientific method, social and cultural influences on science, and scientific bias, was strongly influenced by their experiences in SSI-based learning environments. Furthermore, multidimensional SSI-based science classes resulted in students having multiple reasoning modes, such as ethical and economic reasoning, compared to data-driven SSI-based science classes. In addition to portraying how participants presented complexity, perspectives, inquiry, and skepticism as aspects of socioscientific reasoning (Sadler et al. in Research in Science Education 37:371-391, 2007), this study proposes the inclusion of three additional aspects for the socioscientific reasoning theoretical construct: (1) identification of social domains affecting the SSI, (2) using cost and benefit analysis for evaluation of claims, and (3) understanding that SSIs and scientific studies around them are context-bound.
机译:社会科学研究的研究(SSI)的干预措施是相对较新的(Sadler在科学教学中的研究杂志41:513-536,2004; Zeidler等人。在科学教学研究中,46:74-101,2009),还需要了解更多有关SSI的学习环境的影响(Sadler在科学教学研究中的41:513-536,2004)。李和威特(国际科学教育杂志31:931-960,2009)强调了对详细案例研究的需要,这些研究将侧重于学生如何应对教师的教学教学教学实践。本研究提出了案例研究,调查了中学学生的科学理解和基于SSI的学习环境中的社会科学推理的发展。由于每个案例的上下文差异,为本研究实施了具有嵌入式分析单元的多种案例研究。该研究的调查结果表明,学生对科学的理解,包括科学的方法,社会和文化影响以及科学偏见,受到基于SSI的学习环境的经验强烈影响。此外,与基于数据驱动的SSI的科学类别相比,基于多维SSI的科学课程导致具有多种推理模式的学生,例如道德和经济推理。除了描绘参与者如何呈现复杂性,观点,探究和怀疑,作为社会科学推理的方面(Sadler等人)。本研究提出了包含三个其他方面的社会科学推理理论构建:(1)鉴定影响SSI的社会域,(2)使用索赔评估的成本和效益分析,(3)了解周围的SSIS和科学研究是束缚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号