首页> 外文期刊>Research in science education >Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland
【24h】

Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland

机译:实践中的建构主义:芬兰,德国和瑞士物理教室教学模式和学生动机的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For the last three decades, moderate constructivism has become an increasingly prominent perspective in science education. Researchers have defined characteristics of constructivist-oriented science classrooms, but the implementation of such science teaching in daily classroom practice seems difficult. Against this background, we conducted a sub-study within the tri-national research project Quality of Instruction in Physics (QuIP) analysing 60 videotaped physics classes involving a large sample of students (N = 1192) from Finland, Germany and Switzerland in order to investigate the kinds of constructivist components and teaching patterns that can be found in regular classrooms without any intervention. We applied a newly developed coding scheme to capture constructivist facets of science teaching and conducted principal component and cluster analyses to explore which components and patterns were most prominent in the classes observed. Two underlying components were found, resulting in two scales-Structured Knowledge Acquisition and Fostering Autonomy-which describe key aspects of constructivist teaching. Only the first scale was rather well established in the lessons investigated. Classes were clustered based on these scales. The analysis of the different clusters suggested that teaching physics in a structured way combined with fostering students' autonomy contributes to students' motivation. However, our regression models indicated that content knowledge is a more important predictor for students' motivation, and there was no homogeneous pattern for all gender- and country-specific subgroups investigated. The results are discussed in light of recent discussions on the feasibility of constructivism in practice.
机译:在过去的三十年中,适度的建构主义已成为科学教育越来越突出的角度。研究人员已经确定了建构主义面向科学教室的特点,但在日常课堂实践中实施此类科学教学似乎很困难。在此背景下,我们在物理学(Quip)中的三国研究项目质量范围内进行了一项分布(Quip)分析了60名录像化物理课程,涉及来自芬兰,德国和瑞士的大型学生样本(n = 1192),以便研究可以在没有任何干预的普通教室中找到的建构主义部件和教学模式。我们应用了一个新开发的编码方案来捕获科学教学的建构主义方面,并进行了主成分和群集分析,以探索观察到的课程中最突出的部件和模式。发现了两个潜在的组件,导致两种尺度结构化知识获取和培养自主权 - 描述了建构主义教学的关键方面。在调查的课程中只有第一刻度才能成立。基于这些比例群集类。对不同集群的分析表明,以结构化方式教学物理与培养学生的自治促进学生的动机。然而,我们的回归模型表明内容知识是学生动机的更重要的预测因子,并且对所有调查的所有特定国家和国家特定的亚组没有同质模式。据最近讨论了实践中的建构主义可行性的讨论,因此讨论了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号