...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition & dietetics: the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia >Comparison of malnutrition inflammation score, anthropometry and biochemical parameters in assessing the difference in protein‐energy wasting between normal weight and obese patients undergoing haemodialysis
【24h】

Comparison of malnutrition inflammation score, anthropometry and biochemical parameters in assessing the difference in protein‐energy wasting between normal weight and obese patients undergoing haemodialysis

机译:营养不良炎症评分,人体测量和生化参数评估正常重量与肥胖患者血液透析性患者蛋白能量损害差异的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim Protein‐energy wasting ( PEW ) is prevalent in haemodialysis. Obesity is an independent risk factor of kidney insufficiency, but it is proposed to have beneficial roles in better outcomes in the final stage of disease. Better nutritional status and body reserves are among probable mechanisms, but direct examinations are limited. The present study aimed to investigate whether obese patients have preferable nutritional status compared to normal weight patients based on malnutrition inflammation score ( MIS ) and other PEW parameters in haemodialysis. Methods This case–control study investigated 52 normal weight (18.5??body mass index ( BMI )??25?kg/m 2 ) and 48 obese ( BMI ≥30?kg/m 2 ) patients on regular haemodialysis. PEW was assessed based on anthropometric and biochemical factors, recent weight changes, appetite, anorexia, dietary intake and MIS . Results Obese patients had better MIS compared with the normal weight group ( P ??0.001), although varying degrees of wasting were prevalent among this group too (75% mild and 25% moderate wasting). The obese group had less significant weight loss (4.2 vs 8%) and anorexia and better appetite. However, a considerable percentage of patients in both groups showed muscle (94.6% of normal weight and 19.5% of obese) and peripheral fat tissue (89.2% of normal weight and 31.7% of obese) losses compared to the 50th percentile. Biochemical parameters were not significantly different between groups except for triglyceride ( P ?=?0.001), transferrin and total iron‐binding capacity ( P ?=?0.028). Conclusions MIS was significantly better in obese patients; however, both groups showed degrees of wasting based on MIS and other PEW parameters. Nutritional status of obese haemodialysis patients should be monitored regularly because of high risk of PEW like other BMI categories.
机译:AIM蛋白质 - 能量浪费(PEW)在血液透析中普遍存在。肥胖是肾功能不全的独立危险因素,但建议在疾病的最终阶段更好的结果具有有益的作用。更好的营养状况和身体储备是可能的机制,但直接考试是有限的。目前的研究旨在调查肥胖患者是否具有与血液透析中的营养不良炎症评分(MIS)和其他PEW参数的正常重量患者相比营养状况。方法采用该病例对照研究研究了52重量%(18.5〜体质量指数(BMI)αα,48例(BMI≥30kg / m 2)常规血液透析患者。基于人类测量和生化因素评估PEW,最近的体重变化,食欲,厌食,膳食摄入和MIS。结果肥胖患者与正常重量组相比具有更好的MIS(p≤≤0.001),但是该组中的不同程度的浪费(75%温和和25%温和的浪费)。肥胖组重量损失较小(4.2 vs 8%)和厌食症和更好的食欲。然而,与第50百分位相比,两组患者两组患者患有肌肉(正常重量的94.6%,肥胖的9.5%),与第50百分位数相比,外周脂肪组织(正常重量的89.2%,肥胖的31.7%)。除了甘油三酯(P?= 0.001),转铁蛋白和总铁结合容量(p≤0.028),生物化学参数没有显着差异结论肥胖患者的错误显着更好;然而,两组基于MIS和其他PEW参数显示浪费程度。由于像其他BMI类别一样,应定期监测肥胖血液透析患者的营养状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号