首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education in practice >Effectiveness of problem-based learning on the professional communication competencies of nursing students and nurses: A systematic review
【24h】

Effectiveness of problem-based learning on the professional communication competencies of nursing students and nurses: A systematic review

机译:基于问题的学习对护理学生和护士专业沟通能力的有效性:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) in developing the professional communication competences of nursing students and nurses. We have searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals to identify all the English and Chinese language studies that used PBL to determine the effectiveness of developing professional communication competences of nursing students and nurses. Then two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) for quasi-experimental studies. A total of 12 studies were included, all of which were inclined to low bias. Eleven articles showed that PBL developed the communication skills of nursing students or nurses, while only one article revealed no significant difference between PBL and the traditional method. Owing to differences in experimental design and the method and duration of intervention, some of these studies combined PBL with other methods, and the evaluation tools were different. This systematic review cautiously supports the outcomes of PBL compared with traditional learning.
机译:该系统审查的目的是估计基于问题的学习(PBL)在制定护理学生和护士的职业沟通能力方面的有效性。我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,Medline,Psycinfo,Cochrane图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施,WANFANG数据知识服务平台和VIP数据库,为中国技术期刊识别使用PBL以确定发展的有效性的所有英语和中文研究护理学生和护士的专业沟通能力。然后两个审阅者独立评估了资格和提取数据。使用Cochrane协作的质量评估对随机对照试验的偏见工具的风险和joanna Briggs学院统计评估和审查仪表(JBI-Mastari)进行准实验研究。包括12项研究,所有这些研究都倾向于低偏差。 11文章表明,PBL开发了护理学生或护士的沟通技巧,而只有一篇文章在PBL和传统方法之间没有显着差异。由于实验设计的差异和干预的方法和持续时间,其中一些研究将PBL与其他方法组合,评价工具不同。与传统学习相比,这种系统审查谨慎支持PBL的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号