首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content
【24h】

Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content

机译:极性轨道前额叶皮质和椎体裂片在逻辑推理中的差异作用及负面情绪含量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To answer the question of how brain pathology affects reasoning about negative emotional content, we administered a disjunctive logical reasoning task involving arguments with neutral content (e.g. Either there are tigers or women in NYC, but not both; There are no tigers in NYC; There are women in NYC) and emotionally laden content (e.g. Either there are pedophiles or politicians in Texas, but not both; There are politicians in Texas; There are no pedophiles in Texas) to 92 neurological patients with focal lesions to various parts of the brain. A Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) analysis identified 16 patients, all with lesions to the orbital polar prefrontal cortex (BA 10 & 11), as being selectively impaired in the emotional reasoning condition. Another 17 patients, all with lesions to the parietal cortex, were identified as being impaired in the neutral content condition. The reasoning scores of these two patient groups, along with 23 matched normal controls, underwent additional analysis to explore the effect of belief bias. This analysis revealed that the differences identified above were largely driven by trials where there was an incongruency between the believability of the conclusion and the validity of the argument (i.e. valid argument/false conclusion or invalid argument/true conclusion). Patients with lesions to polar orbital prefrontal cortex underperformed in incongruent emotional content trials and over performed in incongruent neutral content trials (compared to both normal controls and patients with parietal lobe lesions). Patients with lesions to parietal lobes underperformed normal controls (at a trend level) in neutral trials where there was a congruency between the believability of the conclusion and the validity of the argument (i.e. valid argument/true conclusion or invalid argument/false conclusion). We conclude that lesions to the polar orbital prefrontal cortex (i) prevent these patients from enjoying any emotionally induced cognitive boost, and (ii) block the belief bias processing route in the neutral condition. Lesions to parietal lobes result in a generalized impairment in logical reasoning with neutral content.
机译:要回答如何如何影响负面情绪内容的脑病如何影响原因,我们管理了一个涉及中立内容的论据的解除逻辑推理任务(例如,NYC中有老虎或女性,但不是两者; NYC中没有老虎;那里是纽约市的女性)和情绪上满载的内容(例如,德克萨斯州的恋童癖者或政治家,而不是两者;德克萨斯州的政治家;德克萨斯州没有恋童癖者)到92名神经病变患者对大脑的各个部位的焦点病变。体素病变症状测绘(VLSM)分析鉴定了16名患者,所有患者都有病变到眶极性前额叶皮质(BA 10和11),因为在情绪推理条件下被选择性受损。另外17名患者,所有患者都有病变到榫氏皮质,被确定为在中性含量条件下受损。这两种患者组的推理评分以及23种匹配的正常对照,接受了额外的分析,以探讨信仰偏差的效果。该分析表明,上述差异在很大程度上受到试验的推动,其中结论的可信性与论证的有效性之间存在不一致(即有效的论证/错误结论或无效的论证/真实结论)。患者对极性轨道前额定皮层的病变表现不变,在不一致的情绪内容试验中表现不变,在不一致的中性内容试验中进行(与正常对照和患有顶叶病变的患者相比)。患有病变对所在的裂缝的患者表现不佳的正常管制(以趋势水平)在中立试验中,结论的可信性和争论的有效性之间存在一致性(即有效的论证/真实结论或无效的论证/错误结论)。我们得出结论,对极性轨道前额外皮层(I)的病变可防止这些患者享受任何情绪引起的认知升压,并且(ii)阻止在中性条件下的信念偏置处理路线。对顶叶的病变导致逻辑推理中的概括性损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号