首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content
【2h】

Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content

机译:极地眼眶前额叶皮层和顶叶在具有中性和负面情绪内容的逻辑推理中的差异作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To answer the question of how brain pathology affects reasoning about negative emotional content, we administered a disjunctive logical reasoning task involving arguments with neutral content (e.g. Either there are tigers or women in NYC, but not both; There are no tigers in NYC; There are women in NYC) and emotionally laden content (e.g. Either there are pedophiles or politicians in Texas, but not both; There are politicians in Texas; There are no pedophiles in Texas) to 92 neurological patients with focal lesions to various parts of the brain. A Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping (VLSM) analysis identified 16 patients, all with lesions to the orbital polar prefrontal cortex (BA 10 & 11), as being selectively impaired in the emotional reasoning condition. Another 17 patients, all with lesions to the parietal cortex, were identified as being impaired in the neutral content condition. The reasoning scores of these two patient groups, along with 23 matched normal controls, underwent additional analysis to explore the effect of belief bias. This analysis revealed that the differences identified above were largely driven by trials where there was an incongruency between the believability of the conclusion and the validity of the argument (i.e. valid argument/false conclusion or invalid argument/true conclusion). Patients with lesions to polar orbital prefrontal cortex underperformed in incongruent emotional content trials and over performed in incongruent neutral content trials (compared to both normal controls and patients with parietal lobe lesions). Patients with lesions to parietal lobes underperformed normal controls (at a trend level) in neutral trials where there was a congruency between the believability of the conclusion and the validity of the argument (i.e. valid argument/true conclusion or invalid argument/false conclusion). We conclude that lesions to the polar orbital prefrontal cortex (i) prevent these patients from enjoying any emotionally induced cognitive boost, and (ii) block the belief bias processing route in the neutral condition. Lesions to parietal lobes result in a generalized impairment in logical reasoning with neutral content.
机译:为了回答大脑病理学如何影响负面情绪内容的推理的问题,我们执行了包含逻辑中性内容的论断逻辑推理任务(例如,在纽约市有老虎或女性,但不是两者都有;在纽约市没有老虎;有是纽约市的女性)和情感饱满的内容(例如,得克萨斯州有恋童癖者或政治家,但不能两者兼有;得克萨斯州有政治家;得克萨斯州没有恋童癖者)对92名神经病患者有局部大脑局部损害。 Voxel病变症状图谱(VLSM)分析确定了16例患者,这些患者均在情感推理条件下选择性受损,均患有眶极前额叶皮层(BA 10和11)损伤。其余17例均患有顶叶皮损的患者被鉴定为中性含量受损。这两个患者组的推理评分以及23个匹配的正常对照组进行了进一步分析,以探讨信念偏见的影响。该分析表明,以上确定的差异很大程度上是由试验得出的,在该试验中结论的可信度与论点的有效性(即有效论据/错误结论或无效论据/真实结论)之间存在不一致之处。在情绪不协调的试验中,极眼眶前额叶皮损的患者表现不佳,而在中性水平的试验中,患者表现不佳(与正常对照组和顶叶病变患者相比)。在中性试验中,具有顶叶病变的患者表现不如正常对照(在趋势水平上),在结论的可信度与论证的有效性(即有效论据/正确结论或无效论据/错误结论)之间存在一致性。我们得出的结论是,极轨前额叶皮层的病变(i)阻止这些患者享受任何情绪诱导的认知增强,并且(ii)阻止中性条件下的信念偏差处理途径。顶叶裂片会导致逻辑推理普遍中性含量受损。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号