>Crisis communication research has largely focused on investigating crisis response strategies applied by a single organization when aimi'/> Voices in Conflict? The Crisis Communication of Meta-Organizations
首页> 外文期刊>Management Communication Quarterly >Voices in Conflict? The Crisis Communication of Meta-Organizations
【24h】

Voices in Conflict? The Crisis Communication of Meta-Organizations

机译:冲突中的声音? 元组织的危机沟通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

>Crisis communication research has largely focused on investigating crisis response strategies applied by a single organization when aiming to protect its reputation among key stakeholders. Little research has explored the interorganizational dimension of crises, crisis management, and crisis communication,in casu, the role of trade associations. Based on Rhetorical Arena Theory, this article examines two research questions: (1) How do trade associations prepare for crises that may arise for their member organizations and/or for themselves? and (2) How do trade associations communicate during a crisis involving one or more of their members and/or themselves? Do they speak with “one voice,” or do they pursue different strategies? The empirical basis for this research is a case study of how four Danish trade associations representing the clothing industry intervened communicatively when one of their members, Bestseller, faced a double crisis in 2011.]]>
机译:<![CDATA [<摘要XMLNS:XLINK =“http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink”> >危机通讯研究在很大程度上侧重于调查一个组织旨在保护时由一个组织应用的危机反应策略它在关键利益攸关方之间的声誉。小型研究探讨了危机,危机管理和危机沟通的内敛层,在CASU 中,贸易协会的作用。基于修辞竞技场理论,本文审查了两项研究问题:(1)贸易协会如何为其成员组织和/或自己出现的危机做准备? (2)贸易协会如何在涉及其成员和/或自己中的一个或多个成员的危机期间进行沟通?他们是否与“一种声音”说话,或者他们追求不同的策略吗?本研究的实证基础是一项案例研究,其中四名丹麦贸易协会如何在其成员畅销书中沟通沟通,在2011年面临着双重危机。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号