首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Faculty perspectives on the transition to competency-based medical education in anesthesia
【24h】

Faculty perspectives on the transition to competency-based medical education in anesthesia

机译:关于过渡到麻醉中基于能力的医学教育过渡的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose Canadian residency programs are transitioning from time-based to competency-based medical education (CBME). The anesthesia department at Dalhousie University enrolled its first CBME cohort in 2016, one year prior to national anesthesia rollout. Early implementation allowed a unique opportunity to examine faculty anesthesiologists' experiences with the transition. Methods Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory, we conducted a qualitative interview study. In-depth interviews were held with faculty members (n = 12) at varying stages of innovation adoption (e.g., innovators/early adopters, early/late majority, and laggards) at two time points: onset of CBME and one year later. Interview data were analyzed based on the DOI promoting factors: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. Results Relative advantage: Early adopters believed CBME had benefits over the traditional curriculum, while laggards viewed the change as an unproven paradigm shift. CBME was compatible with the values of early adopters, who appreciated resident accountability for learning. Trialability, the degree to which an intervention can be trialed and modified, arose with the early/late majority group, who described an organic process of adaptation over the year. All groups mentioned the need for observable results. Innovators and early adopters were confident CBME would improve learner experiences. Early/late majority noted expedited skill acquisition and improved quality of feedback. Laggards believed observable results would take many years to emerge, if ever. The early/late majority group showed the most progress toward adoption over the study time period, moving from skeptical optimism to active investment. Conclusion Targeted interventions for faculty uptake should emphasize the trialability and observable results achieved over time. These efforts may have the greatest impact in the early/late majority group.
机译:目的,加拿大居住计划正在从基于时间的医学教育(CBME)的时间过渡。 Dalhousie大学的麻醉部门于2016年注册了第一个CBME队列,一年是国家麻醉推出前一年。早期实施允许一个独特的机会来检查教师的过渡经历。使用Rogers的创新(DOI)理论的方法,我们进行了一个定性面试研究。在两个时间点,在创新采用的不同阶段(例如,创新者/早期采用者,早期/晚期/晚期/晚期/晚期/晚期/晚期/晚期)的不同阶段进行了深入的访谈:宣布CBME和一年后。根据DOI促进因素分析采访数据:相对优势,兼容性,复杂性,可试验性和可观察性。结果相对优势:早期采用者相信CBME对传统课程有益,而落后则认为变化作为未经证实的范式转变。 CBME与早期采用者的价值观兼容,他欣赏居民学习责任。可试验性,可以试验干预的程度,并与早期/晚期组织出现,他在年内描述了适应的有机过程。所有群组都提到了可观察结果的需求。创新者和早期采用者相信CBME将改善学习者体验。早期/迟到的大多数人都注意到了快速的技能获取和改善的反馈质量。落后的人认为,如果有的话,可以多年来需要多年的结果。早期/晚期集团在研究时间段中展出了最大进展,从持怀疑态度持怀疑态度到积极投资。结论教师摄取的有针对性的干预措施应强调随着时间的推移实现的可试验性和可观察结果。这些努力可能对早期/晚期群体的影响最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号