首页> 外文期刊>Biochemistry and molecular biology education >Individual identification and correction of mistakes in statements of biochemical significance: An effective learning process for graduate medical students
【24h】

Individual identification and correction of mistakes in statements of biochemical significance: An effective learning process for graduate medical students

机译:生物化学意义陈述中的个人识别和纠正:研究生学生有效的学习过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Focused self-directed learning process needs to be promoted at present among graduate medical students in view of the information load and limited time available with them. In this study, comparison of the effect of identifying and correcting the mistakes in a given set of wrong statements with the effect of studying correct statements individually by graduate medical students on their understanding of the topic "Cancer Biology" was carried out. At the end of regular teaching module, students were asked to identify the mistakes in a set of seven incorrect statements and correct them individually without peer consultation. Another set of seven correct statements were also provided to them and were asked to study their significance. The effects on low, medium, and high achievers were evaluated by pre- and post-tests with the same set of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs). Mean post-test marks were significantly higher among all the three groups compared to pretest marks for the wrong statements given. For the correct statements, the post-test marks were significantly higher than the pretest marks only for the low and medium achievers. The gain from identifying the mistakes was higher than studying the correct statements for all the three groups of students. Individual correction of errors in statements is a superior active learning process in comparison to the study of correct statements. (c) 2019 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 47(4):476-480, 2019.
机译:考虑到他们提供的信息负载和有限时间,目前需要促进专注的自我指导学习过程。在这项研究中,在通过研究生医学生对他们对“癌症生物学”主题的理解中单独学习正确陈述的效果,对特定的错误陈述中识别和纠正错误陈述的效果进行比较。在常规教学模块结束时,学生被要求在没有同行咨询的情况下单独纠正他们的七个错误陈述中的错误。还向他们提供了另一套七种正确陈述,并被要求研究他们的意义。通过与同一组多项选择题(MCQ)的测试预先测试和测试后对低,培养基和高成就器的影响。与错误的陈述的预测试标记相比,所有三组的测试标记在所有三组中都显着更高。对于正确的陈述,后测试标记显着高于低和中型成就者的预测试标记。识别错误的收益高于研究所有三组学生的正确陈述。与对正确陈述的研究相比,陈述中错误的个人校正是一种优越的主动学习过程。 (c)2019年生化和分子生物学联盟,47(4):476-480,2019。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号