首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, C. Nanomaterials and interfaces >Probing the Mechanism of Fluorescence Quenching of QDs by Co(III)-Complexes: Size of QD and Nature of the Complex Both Dictate Energy and Electron Transfer Processes
【24h】

Probing the Mechanism of Fluorescence Quenching of QDs by Co(III)-Complexes: Size of QD and Nature of the Complex Both Dictate Energy and Electron Transfer Processes

机译:Co(III)-络合物对量子点的荧光猝灭机理的探究:量子点的大小以及分子的能量和电子转移过程的复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The decrease in photoluminescence (PL) of four different sized CdSe colloidal quantum dots (donors) has been investigated in the presence of three different Cobalt(III) complexes (acceptors). The steady-state and time-resolved PL (TRPL) spectroscopy have been used to investigate the mechanism of quenching. The complex concentration driven change in lifetimes of QDs and stronger PL quenching than predicted solely by TRPL data indicate that the quenching is neither purely static nor purely dynamic in nature. Further, the absence of any ground state complex absorption feature suggests that the static quenching contribution is due to the close proximity of the QDs fluorophores and deactivating sites of complexes. The dynamic quenching processes like diffusion mediated collisional quenching, Dexter energy transfer, and hole transfer have been methodically ruled out, leaving Forster resonant energy transfer (FRET) and the electron transfer (eT) between the QDs and complexes as the possible mechanisms. The Marcus model of eT has been successfully used to demonstrate the otherwise looking random trends of experimental eT rates. The apparent static contributions have been separated from the total quenching by normalization of steady state PL with TRPL data. Finally, FRET and eT mediated dynamic quenching in conjunction with the donor acceptor proximity driven static quenching was used to explain steady state PL quenching trends.
机译:在三种不同的钴(III)配合物(受体)存在下,已经研究了四种不同尺寸的CdSe胶体量子点(供体)的光致发光(PL)的降低。稳态和时间分辨PL(TRPL)光谱已用于研究淬灭机理。 QD寿命的复杂浓度驱动变化以及比TRPL数据单独预测的更强的PL猝灭表明,猝灭本质上既不是纯静态的也不是纯动态的。此外,不存在任何基态复合物吸收特征表明,静态猝灭贡献是由于QDs荧光团和复合物的失活位点的紧密接近所致。系统地排除了诸如扩散介导的碰撞猝灭,Dexter能量转移和空穴转移之类的动态猝灭过程,而QD和配合物之间的Forster共振能量转移(FRET)和电子转移(eT)则可能成为机制。 eT的Marcus模型已被成功地用来证明实验eT率的随机趋势。通过使用TRPL数据对稳态PL进行归一化,已将表观静态贡献与总淬灭区分开。最后,FRET和eT介导的动态猝灭与供体受体邻近驱动的静态猝灭一起用于解释稳态PL猝灭趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号