首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract >Comparative study on three types of alimentary reconstruction after total gastrectomy.
【24h】

Comparative study on three types of alimentary reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

机译:全胃切除术后三种饮食重建的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: More than 70 alimentary reconstruction procedures after total gastrectomy have been proposed to reduce the postoperative syndromes such as dumping syndrome, reflux esophagitis, and malnutrition. However, the optimal alimentary reconstruction method is still a matter of debate. The aim of the current study was to investigate the rationality of different alimentary tract reconstruction methods after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy. METHODS: Three types of digestive reconstruction methods were performed after total gastrectomy in 285 cases of gastric malignancy from May 1996 to December 2006, including Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction (Orr-type), P-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction (P-type), and Moynihan-type reconstruction (Moynihan-type) methods. The operative time, early postoperative complications and mortality, food intake, alimentary symptoms, Visick scores, nutritional status at 1 and 3years after surgery, and cumulative survival at 1, 3, and 5years were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three methods in early postoperative complications and mortality, postoperative food intake and nutritional status (hemoglobin, total proteins and albumin), and incidence of diarrhea and dumping syndrome at 1 and 3years (p > 0.05). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rate were 75.30%, 39.86%, and 21.48%, respectively, without significant differences among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, the average operative time used in the Orr-type reconstruction method (2.9 +/- 0.1h) was comparatively shorter than that used in the P-type (3.4 +/- 0.2h) and the Moynihan-type (3.2 +/- 0.1h). The incidences of reflux esophagitis after the gastric reconstruction with the Moynihan-type method at 1 and 3years (72% and 65%) were significantly higher than that with the Orr-type (3% and 0%) and P-type (5% and 0%; p < 0.01). Constituent ratio of Visick scores I-II of the Moynihan-type method at 1 and 3years (54% and 73%) were smaller than that of the Orr-type (94% and 96%) and the P-type (93% and 96%) methods (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction method can avoid reflux esophagitis, and the procedure is simpler than the other two methods. Therefore, Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction can be recommended as an adoptable method of digestive reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
机译:背景:全胃切除术后70例以上的消化道重建手术已被提议用于减少术后综合征,例如倾倒综合征,反流性食管炎和营养不良。然而,最佳的饮食重建方法仍是一个争论的问题。本研究的目的是探讨全胃切除术治疗胃恶性肿瘤后不同消化道重建方法的合理性。方法:从1996年5月至2006年12月,对285例胃恶性肿瘤行全胃切除术后进行三种消化重建方法,包括Orr型Roux-en-Y重建(Orr型),P型Roux-en-Y重建。重建(P型)和Moynihan型重建(Moynihan型)方法。比较分析手术时间,术后早期并发症和死亡率,食物摄入量,饮食症状,Visick评分,术后1年和3年的营养状况以及1年,3年和5年的累积生存率。结果:三种方法在术后早期并发症和死亡率,术后食物摄入和营养状况(血红蛋白,总蛋白和白蛋白)以及1年和3年腹泻和倾倒综合征的发生率方面无显着差异(p> 0.05)。总体1年,3年和5年累积生存率分别为75.30%,39.86%和21.48%,三组之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。但是,在Orr型重建方法中使用的平均手术时间(2.9 +/- 0.1h)相对短于P型(3.4 +/- 0.2h)和Moynihan型(3.2 + / -0.1小时)。 Moynihan型方法在胃重建术后1年和3年的返流性食管炎的发生率(72%和65%)显着高于Orr型(3%和0%)和P型(5%)和0%; p <0.01)。 Moynihan型方法在1年和3年时的Visick评分I-II的成分比率(54%和73%)小于Orr型(94%和96%)和P型(93%和96%)方法(p <0.01)。结论:Orr型Roux-en-Y重建术可避免反流性食管炎,且比其他两种方法更为简便。因此,建议将Orr型Roux-en-Y重建作为胃癌全胃切除术后消化重建的可采用方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号