...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >Small-sided games for young athletes: is game specificity influential?
【24h】

Small-sided games for young athletes: is game specificity influential?

机译:适合年轻运动员的小型比赛:比赛特异性有影响力吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study aimed to quantify and compare the physiological, physical and technical demands of a sport-specific and non-sport-specific small-sided game (SSG) in young athletes. Ten male soccer players (mean ± SD: age, 13.0 ± 0.3 years, V?O2peak, 54.4 ± 4.9 ml · kg-1 · min-1) completed 3 vs. 3 and 6 vs. 6 soccer and "bucketball" SSGs twice. Games lasted for 16 min and were performed in a randomised order, at least 48 h apart. Movement patterns and heart rate were measured using 4 Hz global positioning systems. Technical skill executions were assessed by video analysis and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg scale (RPEs, 6-20). Total distance (4.9 ± 4.1% and 8.3 ± 6.6%), distance at 7-12.9 km · h-1 (14.5 ± 12.5% and 14.9 ± 16.1%), total possessions (14.7 ± 18.0% and 12.9 ± 18.9%) and percentage of successful passes (24.1 ± 11.7% and 30.1 ± 17.6%) were higher for bucketball compared to soccer (3 vs. 3 and 6 vs. 6, respectively). Total distance at 13-17.9 km · h-1 was higher for 6 vs. 6 than 3 vs. 3 bucketball (32.3 ± 21.2%). There was likely substantial difference for %HRpeak (89.5 ± 3.1 vs. 87.4 ± 2.8 b · min-1) and time above 90% HRpeak (570 ± 288 s vs. 361 ± 288 s) between bucketball and soccer (3 vs. 3 and 6 vs. 6, respectively). Young players travelled further at higher overall speeds, experienced higher physiological workloads and performed more successful technical executions during the non-sport-specific SSG.
机译:这项研究的目的是量化和比较年轻运动员的针对特定运动和非针对运动的小型双面比赛(SSG)的生理,生理和技术要求。十名男性足球运动员(平均年龄:SD,年龄13.0±0.3岁,V2O2峰值,54.4±4.9 ml·kg-1·min-1)两次完成了3对3和6对6足球和“水桶” SSG 。游戏持续了16分钟,并且以随机顺序进行,至少间隔48小时。使用4 Hz全球定位系统测量运动模式和心率。通过视频分析和使用博格量表(RPEs,6-20)的感知劳累(RPE)评估来评估技术技能的执行情况。总距离(4.9±4.1%和8.3±6.6%),7-12.9 km·h-1处的距离(14.5±12.5%和14.9±16.1%),总拥有量(14.7±18.0%和12.9±18.9%)和与足球相比,水桶球的成功传球百分比(24.1±11.7%和30.1±17.6%)更高(分别为3比3和6比6)。 6对6比6对3比3对3斗球在13-17.9 km·h-1的总距离更高(32.3±21.2%)。斗球和足球之间的%HRpeak(89.5±3.1 vs. 87.4±2.8 b·min-1)和高于90%HRpeak的时间(570±288 s vs. 361±288 s)可能存在实质性差异(3 vs. 3)和6对6)。年轻运动员在非体育特定的SSG期间以更高的整体速度走得更远,经历了更高的生理工作量,并且执行了更为成功的技术执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号