首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Internal and External Load Variations in Young Students: Comparisons between Small-Sided Games and Small-Sided Games Combined with Strength Training during Physical Education Classes
【2h】

Internal and External Load Variations in Young Students: Comparisons between Small-Sided Games and Small-Sided Games Combined with Strength Training during Physical Education Classes

机译:年轻学生的内部和外部负荷变化:小型游戏与小型游戏的比较结合体育课程中的力量训练

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of internal and external load in soccer small-sided games (SSGs) and a strength program based on CrossFit combined with SSGs for 7 weeks. Fifty-five students participated in this research (age: 9.04 ± 0.19 years) and were randomly assigned to SSGs (n = 27) or strength combined with SSGs (n = 29) group. Two sessions/week were implemented. The results revealed that internal load on SSGs promoted higher levels (p ≤ 0.001; d = 0.35) of light physical activity (PA) (12.24 cpm) compared with strength combined with SSGs (11.46) and % heart rate (%HR) max (p = 0.002; d = 0.48) between SSGs (96.21) regarding strength combined with SSGs (92.09). On external load, significant differences appear in total distance (p ≤ 0.001; d = 0.80) on SSGs (1326 m) compared with strength combined with SSGs (1004 m) and mean velocity (p ≤ 0.001; d = 0.63) in both groups; 2.71 km/h on SSGs and 2.26 km/h on strength combined with SSGs. The SSGs seem to be more appropriate at the beginning of sessions, but as the weeks advance, strength combined with SSGs results in improved internal load compared with SSGs.
机译:本研究的目的是比较基于Crossfit的足球小型游戏(SSG)和强度计划的内部和外部负荷与SSG组合的强度计划进行比较7周。五十五名学生参加了本研究(年龄:9.04±0.19年),随机分配给SSG(n = 27)或与SSGS(n = 29)组合的强度。实施了两个会议/周。结果显示,与SSG(11.46)和MAX%(%HR)最大(%HR)最大(%HR)最大(%HR)最大(%HR)最大(在SSG(96.21)之间的P = 0.002; d = 0.48)关于强度与SSG(92.09)组合。在外部载荷上,在SSG(1326米)上的总距离(P≤0.001; d = 0.80)出现显着差异与两个组中的SSG(1004 m)和平均速度(p≤0.001; d = 0.63)相比; SSGS上2.71 km / h和2.26公里/小时的力量与SSGS相结合。在会话开始时,SSGS似乎更合适,但随着时间的推移,与SSGS相比,与SSGS相结合的强度导致内部负荷改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号