首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Vertical jump biomechanics after plyometric, weight lifting, and combined (weight lifting + plyometric) training.
【24h】

Vertical jump biomechanics after plyometric, weight lifting, and combined (weight lifting + plyometric) training.

机译:体能训练,举重和组合(举重+体能训练)训练后的垂直跳动生物力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of an Olympic weight lifting (OL), a plyometric (PL), and combined weight lifting + plyometric (WP) training program on vertical jump (VJ) biomechanics. Thirty-six men were assigned randomly to 4 groups: PL group (n = 9), OL group (n = 9), WP group (), and control (C) group (n = 8). The experimental groups trained 3 d.wk, for 8 weeks. Sagital kinematics, VJ height, power, and electromyographic (EMG) activity from rectus femoris (RF) and medial gastrocnemius (GAS) were collected during squat jumping and countermovement jumping (CMJ) before and after training. The results showed that all experimental groups improved VJ height (p < 0.05). The OL training improved power and muscle activation during the concentric phase of the CMJ while the subjects used a technique with wider hip and knee angles after training (p < 0.05). The PL group subjects did not change their CMJ technique although there was an increase in RF activation and a decrease of GAS activity after training (p < 0.05). The WP group displayed a decline in maximal hip angle and a lower activation during the CMJ after training (p < 0.05). These results indicate that all training programs are adequate for improving VJ performance. However, the mechanisms for these improvements differ between the 3 training protocols. Olympic weight lifting training might be more appropriate to achieve changes in VJ performance and power in the precompetition period of the training season. Emphasis on the PL exercises should be given when the competition period approaches, whereas the combination of OL and PL exercises may be used in the transition phases from precompetition to the competition period.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较奥林匹克举重(OL),胸肌(PL)和组合举重+胸肌(WP)训练程序对垂直跳跃(VJ)生物力学的影响。将36名男性随机分为4组:PL组(n = 9),OL组(n = 9),WP组()和对照组(C)组(n = 8)。实验组每周3 d训练8周。在训练前后的蹲跳和反跳动作(CMJ)期间收集来自股直肌(RF)和内侧腓肠肌(GAS)的矢状运动学,VJ身高,力量和肌电图(EMG)活动。结果表明,所有实验组均改善了VJ高度(p <0.05)。 OL训练在CMJ的同心阶段改善了力量和肌肉激活,而受试者在训练后使用了较宽的髋部和膝盖角度的技术(p <0.05)。尽管训练后RF激活增加且GAS活性降低,但PL组受试者并未改变其CMJ技术(p <0.05)。训练后,WP组在CMJ期间显示最大髋关节角下降和较低的激活(p <0.05)。这些结果表明,所有培训计划都足以改善VJ表现。但是,这些改进的机制在3种训练方案之间有所不同。奥林匹克举重训练可能更适合在训练季的赛前阶段改变VJ的表现和力量。在比赛期间临近时,应强调PL练习,而OL和PL练习的组合可用于从赛前到比赛期间的过渡阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号