首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of FCAT Reading and Writing-Or Is It Writing and Reading?
【24h】

Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of FCAT Reading and Writing-Or Is It Writing and Reading?

机译:FCAT读写的多特征多方法分析-还是读写?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the high-stakes Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) in both reading and writing at grade levels 4, 8, and 10. The data from the 2006 FCAT administration were analyzed via traditional multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis to identify the factor structure and structural equation models (SEMs), to determine the weights of the influential variables underlying the tests. The MTMM analyses suggested that across all grade levels, the correlation between the multiple-choice reading and multiple-choice writing tests of the FCAT approached the reliability coefficients for each test separately. These correlations were higher than the correlations between the multiple choice and performance sections for each trait. The SEM analyses, however, provided support for both the convergent and discriminant validity of the test scores. The fit for the SEMs improved from a CFI of .84 for 4th graders (a poor fit) to .97 for 10th-grade students.
机译:这项研究调查了高风险佛罗里达综合评估测试(FCAT)在4、8和10年级阅读和写作中的收敛性和判别有效性。采用传统的多特征多方法(2006( MTMM)分析,以确定因素结构和结构方程模型(SEM),以确定测试基础影响力变量的权重。 MTMM分析表明,在所有年级,FCAT的多项选择阅读和多项选择写作测试之间的相关性分别接近于每种测试的可靠性系数。这些相关性高于每个性状的多项选择和绩效部分之间的相关性。扫描电镜分析,但是,为测试分数的收敛性和判别有效性提供了支持。 SEM的拟合度从4年级的CFI为0.84(较差)提高到10年级的CFI为0.97。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号