首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurology >Does improved problem-based teaching influence students' knowledge at the end of their neurology elective? An observational study of 40 students.
【24h】

Does improved problem-based teaching influence students' knowledge at the end of their neurology elective? An observational study of 40 students.

机译:在以神经科为基础的选修课结束时,改进的基于问题的教学是否会影响学生的知识?对40名学生的观察性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Elective programs for medical students in the last year of their university training are poorly evaluated. The goal of this study was to determine the gain in theoretical and practical skills in a group of students during their elective in neurology. Students were trained by either conventional teaching methods or applying improved problem-based teaching. METHOD: A test of 78 multiple choice questions regarding both, theoretical and practical aspects of clinical neurology, was presented to 21 students (9 female, 12 male). This group of students (group A) was trained according to the conventional teaching method. A subsequent group of students (intervention group B; n = 19; 9 female; 10 male) was educated using a modified teaching method that consisted of more problem-based learning, gathering experience with neurosonological and neurophysiological principles and in intense bedside teaching. The test was performed at the beginning and end of their elective period. The percentage increase in the tests was taken as the primary endpoint. In addition, all students were asked about their degree of satisfaction with the elective in general. RESULTS: Students of both groups did not differ with regard to age, gender, number of semesters, score of last examination and score of the test at the beginning of the elective. However, students who participated in the problem-based teaching group (group B) performed significantly better in the test at the end of the elective (increase 16.3% +/- 15.5) than those who were trained according to the conventional teaching program (percentage increase 6.3% +/- 9.4; p = 0.017). Students of both groups were highly satisfied with the elective in general. CONCLUSION: More problem-based teaching including practical exercises and intense bed-side teaching significantly improved students' performance. Thus, adaptation of teaching covering these aspects should be encouraged and might improve the neurological knowledge and skills of the students.
机译:背景:在大学训练的最后一年中,针对医学生的选修课程评价不佳。这项研究的目的是确定一组学生在神经科选修课期间的理论和实践技能的提高。通过常规教学方法或采用基于问题的改进教学对学生进行了培训。方法:对21名学生(9名女性,12名男性)进行了关于临床神经病学的理论和实践方面的78个多项选择题的测试。这组学生(A组)是按照常规教学方法进行训练的。随后的一组学生(干预组B; n = 19; 9名女性; 10名男性)采用改良的教学方法进行了教育,该教学方法包括更多基于问题的学习,收集有关神经超声和神经生理学原理的经验以及在紧张的床边教学中。在选修课的开始和结束时进行了测试。测试中的增加百分比被视为主要终点。此外,所有学生都被问及他们对选修课的总体满意度。结果:两组学生的年龄,性别,学期数,最后一次考试成绩和选修课开始时的考试成绩都没有差异。但是,参加基于问题的教学组(B组)的学生在选修课结束时的测试中表现显着更好(提高16.3%+/- 15.5),而与按照常规教学计划进行培训的学生相比(百分比)增加6.3%+/- 9.4; p = 0.017)。两组学生对选修课总体上都非常满意。结论:更多的基于问题的教学,包括实践练习和紧张的床旁教学,显着提高了学生的表现。因此,应鼓励涵盖这些方面的教学适应,并可能改善学生的神经学知识和技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号