首页> 外文期刊>The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine >Team-based learning, a learning strategy for clinical reasoning, in students with problem-based learning tutorial experiences
【24h】

Team-based learning, a learning strategy for clinical reasoning, in students with problem-based learning tutorial experiences

机译:具有基于问题的学习教程经验的学生基于团队的学习,一种用于临床推理的学习策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Acquiring clinical reasoning skills in lectures may be difficult, but it can be learnt through problem-solving in the context of clinical practice. Problem finding and solving are skills required for clinical reasoning; however, students who underwent problem-based learning (PBL) still have difficulty in acquiring clinical reasoning skills. We hypothesized that team-based learning (TBL), a learning strategy that provides the opportunity to solve problems by repeatedly taking tests, can enhance the clinical reasoning ability in medical students with PBL experiences during the pre-clinical years. TBL courses were designed for 4th year students in a 6-year program in 2008, 2009, and 2010. TBL individual scores, consisting of a combination of individual and group tests, were compared with scores of several examinations including computer-based testing (CBT), an original examination assessing clinical reasoning ability (problem-solving ability test; P-SAT), term examinations, and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). CBT, OSCE and P-SAT scores were compared with those of students who learned clinical reasoning only through PBL tutorials in 2005, 2006, and 2007 (non-TBL students). Individual TBL scores of students did not correlate with scores of any other examination. Assessments on clinical reasoning ability, such as CBT, OSCE, and P-SAT scores, were significantly higher in TBL students compared with non-TBL students. Students found TBL to be effective, particularly in areas of problem solving by both individuals and teams, and feedback from specialists. In conclusion, TBL for clinical reasoning is useful in improving clinical reasoning ability in students with PBL experiences with limited clinical exposure.
机译:在讲座中获得临床推理技能可能很困难,但是可以通过在临床实践中解决问题来学习。发现问题和解决问题是临床推理所需的技能;但是,接受基于问题的学习(PBL)的学生仍然很难掌握临床推理技能。我们假设基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种通过反复参加测试来解决问题的机会的学习策略,可以提高临床前几年具有PBL经验的医学生的临床推理能力。 TBL课程是在2008年,2009年和2010年为四年制课程设计的四年级学生而设计的。将TBL个人分数(包括个人和小组测试的组合)与包括计算机测试(CBT)在内的多项考试的分数进行比较),评估临床推理能力的原始考试(问题解决能力测试; P-SAT),学期考试和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。将CBT,OSCE和P-SAT分数与仅在2005、2006和2007年通过PBL辅导学习临床推理的学生(非TBL学生)的分数进行了比较。学生的个人TBL分数与任何其他考试的分数均不相关。与非TBL学生相比,TBL学生对临床推理能力的评估(例如CBT,OSCE和P-SAT分数)显着更高。学生发现TBL是有效的,特别是在个人和团队解决问题以及专家反馈方面。总之,用于临床推理的TBL对于提高具有有限临床暴露的PBL经验的学生的临床推理能力很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号