首页> 外文期刊>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries >Qualitative risk assessment of a Dual Fuel (LNG-Diesel) system for heavy-duty trucks
【24h】

Qualitative risk assessment of a Dual Fuel (LNG-Diesel) system for heavy-duty trucks

机译:重型卡车双燃料(LNG-柴油)系统的定性风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Dual Fuel (LNG-Diesel) system can be applied to heavy-duty diesel trucks for achieving environmental benefits in comparison to existing diesel vehicles. Because of lack of reports about risk assessment of this technology, we performed a qualitative assessment based on a framework of some literature techniques for risk identification, analysis and evaluation. After constructing a Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) to establish the context, we conducted bow-tie analysis, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), likelihood and consequence analysis, and used a risk matrix. We applied these methods and techniques qualitatively to identify causes (e.g. collisions), critical events (e.g. releases of natural gas), related consequences (e.g. fires and explosions), and different possible pathways from a specific cause to its consequence, and to assess some negative accident scenarios related to use and parking of the vehicle. The bow-tie analysis also allowed to make explicit barriers and controls that prevent critical events and/or mitigate consequences. Therefore, we identified a set of safety measures, including design, technical, management, and emergency actions, which shall be implemented in each step of the system's life cycle. Our risk assessment showed that the risk level of the Dual Fuel (LNG-Diesel) system is similar to the risk level of a traditional diesel system. Future research will overcome current lack of data and, therefore, permit a quantitative rating of the risk of the Dual Fuel (LNG-Diesel) system. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:可以将双燃料(LNG-Diesel)系统应用于重型柴油卡车,以实现与现有柴油车相比的环境效益。由于缺乏有关该技术风险评估的报告,我们基于一些文献技术对风险识别,分析和评估进行了定性评估。在构建了用于建立上下文的可靠性框图(RBD)之后,我们进行了领结分析,故障树分析(FTA),失效模式和影响分析(FMEA),可能性和后果分析,并使用了风险矩阵。我们定性地应用了这些方法和技术来确定原因(例如碰撞),关键事件(例如天然气释放),相关后果(例如火灾和爆炸)以及从特定原因到其后果的不同可能途径,并评估一些与车辆使用和停车有关的负面事故场景。领结分析还允许做出明确的障碍和控制措施,以防止重大事件和/或减轻后果。因此,我们确定了一套安全措施,包括设计,技术,管理和紧急措施,这些措施应在系统生命周期的每个步骤中执行。我们的风险评估表明,双燃料(LNG-Diesel)系统的风险水平与传统柴油系统的风险水平相似。未来的研究将克服目前缺乏数据的问题,因此,可以对双燃料(LNG-柴油)系统的风险进行定量评估。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号