首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Efficacy and safety of weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen compared with glucose level- And current dose-based regimens in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen compared with glucose level- And current dose-based regimens in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled study

机译:体重为基础的胰岛素甘精胰岛素剂量滴定方案与葡萄糖水平相比的有效性和安全性-以及目前基于剂量的方案在住院的2型糖尿病患者中的随机对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Insulin glargine is widely used as basal insulin. However, published dose titration regimens for insulin glargine are complex. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a user-friendly, weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen with 2 published regimens. Methods: A total of 160 hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia in 3 medical centers were screened. Our inclusion criteria included age 18 to 80 years and being conscious. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or breast-feeding and hepatic or renal dysfunction. A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to receive weight-based, glucose level-based, or dose-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen between January 2011 and February 2013. The initial dose of insulin glargine was 0.2 U/kg. In the weight-based regimen (n = 49), the dose was titrated by increments of 0.1 U/kg daily. In the glucose level-based regimen (n = 51), the dose was titrated by 2, 4, 6, or 8 U daily when fasting blood glucose (FBG) was, respectively, between 7.0 and 7.9, 8.0 and 8.9, 9.0 and 9.9, or ≥10 mmol/L. In the current dose-based regimen (n = 49), titration was by daily increments of 20% of the current dose. The target FBG in all groups was ≤7.0 mmol/L. The incidence of hypoglycemia was recorded. One-way ANOVA and χ2 test were used to compare data between the 3 groups. Findings: All but 1 patient who required additional oral antidiabetic medication completed the study. The mean (SD) time to achieve target FBG was 3.2 (1.2) days with the weight-based regimen and 3.7 (1.5) days with the glucose level-based regimen (P = 0.266). These times were both shorter than that achieved with the current dose-based regimen (4.8 [2.8] days; P = 0.0001 and P = 0.005, respectively). The daily doses of insulin glargine at the study end point were 0.43 (0.13) U/kg with the weight-based regimen, 0.50 (0.20) U/kg with the glucose level-based regimen, and 0.47 (0.23) U/kg with the current dose-based regimen (P = 0.184). The incidence of hypoglycemia was 4.1%, 2.0%, and 6.3%, respectively (P = 0.557). Implications: The currently proposed weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen is effective, tolerable, and user-friendly at achieving FBG target levels in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia.
机译:目的:甘精胰岛素被广泛用作基础胰岛素。但是,已公布的甘精胰岛素剂量调整方案很复杂。这项研究旨在比较用户友好的,基于体重的甘精胰岛素剂量滴定方案与2种已公开方案的疗效和安全性。方法:对3个医疗中心的160例住院的高血糖患者进行筛查。我们的入选标准包括18至80岁和有意识。排除标准包括怀孕或哺乳以及肝或肾功能不全。在2011年1月至2013年2月之间,总共149名患者被随机分配接受基于体重,基于葡萄糖水平或剂量的胰岛素甘精胰岛素剂量滴定方案。胰岛素甘精胰岛素的初始剂量为0.2 U / kg。在基于体重的方案(n = 49)中,剂量以每天0.1 U / kg的增量滴定。在基于葡萄糖水平的方案(n = 51)中,当空腹血糖(FBG)分别在7.0和7.9、8.0和8.9、9.0和9.0之间时,每天以2、4、6、8 U滴定剂量。 9.9或≥10mmol / L。在当前基于剂量的方案(n = 49)中,滴定是每天递增当前剂量的20%。所有组的目标FBG≤7.0mmol / L。记录低血糖的发生率。单因素方差分析和χ2检验用于比较3组之间的数据。结果:除1名需要额外口服抗糖尿病药物的患者外,所有患者均完成了研究。基于体重的方案,达到目标FBG的平均(SD)时间为3.2(1.2)天,而基于葡萄糖水平的方案,则为3.7(1.5)天(P = 0.266)。这些时间均短于当前以剂量为基础的方案所获得的时间(4.8 [2.8]天; P = 0.0001和P = 0.005)。在研究终点,甘精胰岛素的日剂量在以体重为基础的方案中为0.43(0.13)U / kg,以葡萄糖水平为基础的方案为0.50(0.20)U / kg,在以糖水平为基础的方案中为0.47(0.23)U / kg。当前的基于剂量的方案(P = 0.184)。低血糖的发生率分别为4.1%,2.0%和6.3%(P = 0.557)。启示:目前提出的基于体重的甘精胰岛素剂量滴定方案在住院的高血糖患者中达到FBG目标水平是有效,可耐受和用户友好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号