首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine journal >Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec U100 and insulin glargine U100 in combination with meal-time bolus insulin in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: an open-label, randomized controlled study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec U100 and insulin glargine U100 in combination with meal-time bolus insulin in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: an open-label, randomized controlled study

机译:胰岛素Degludec U100和胰岛素冰柱U100与2型糖尿病患者的膳食时间推注胰岛素组合的疗效和安全性:开放标签,随机对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The short-term efficacy and safety of insulin degludec U100 (IDeg) in patients with type 2 diabetes have not been reported widely. We compared insulin IDeg and insulin glargine U100 (IGla) for glycemic control and glucose variability in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. In an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 74 patients were randomly assigned to either the IDeg (36 patients) or IGla (38 patients) group and were administered with basal-bolus therapy during hospitalization. Following the start of the treatment, on day 11, glucose variability was assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. A fasting blood glucose level of 110 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL throughout at least one day during the observation period were achieved in 31.3% (10/32) and 30.6% (11/36) of the patients in the IDeg and IGla groups, respectively. The 6-point self-monitoring of blood glucose profiles showed a significant difference between the two groups. On day 7, the intra-day variation was larger in the IDeg group than in the IGla group. The incidence of hypoglycemia or glucose variability was comparable in the two groups. This study suggests that short-term efficacy and safety of IDeg and IGla in patients with type 2 diabetes during the initial phase of basal-bolus therapy were comparable, and these results can help in deciding which treatment to opt for.
机译:2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素Degludec U100(IDEG)的短期疗效和安全性尚未得到广泛报道。我们比较了胰岛素IDEG和胰岛素甘草U100(IGLA)在住院患者2型糖尿病患者中进行血糖控制和葡萄糖变异性。在开放标签,多中心,随机对照试验中,74名患者被随机分配给IDEG(36名患者)或IGLA(38名患者)组,并在住院期间用基础推注疗法进行给药。在治疗开始之后,在第11天,通过连续葡萄糖监测评估葡萄糖变异性。在观察期间,在31.3%(10/32)和30.6%(11/36)中,在观察期内至少有一天,在观察期内至少一天的110mg / dl和2小时后血糖水平的血糖水平为180mg / dl的血糖水平。 IDEG和IGLA群体的患者分别。血糖谱的6点自我监测显示两组之间的显着差异。在第7天,IDEG组的日内变异比IGLA组更大。二血糖或葡萄糖变异性的发生率在两组中可相当。本研究表明,在基底血管疗法初始阶段患有2型糖尿病患者IDEG和IgLA的短期疗效和安全性相当,这些结果可以帮助决定哪种处理以选择哪种处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号