首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Utility of cross-matched platelet transfusions in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: A systematic review
【24h】

Utility of cross-matched platelet transfusions in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: A systematic review

机译:交叉匹配血小板输注在增生性血小板减少症患者中的作用:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Multiply transfused hypoproliferative thrombocytopenic (HT) patients with alloimmune transfusion refractoriness require specially selected platelets (PLTs). Cross-matching apheresis PLTs is a popular support option, avoiding requirements for large panels of typed donors for HLA-based selection. We undertook a systematic review of the utility of various cross-matching techniques on mortality reduction, prevention of hemorrhage, alloimmunization and refractoriness, and improvement in PLT utilization or count increments. Study Design and Methods A systematic review to December 2012 was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases along with a bibliographic search of pertinent references. Results Of 146 retrieved citations, 20 met inclusion criteria. Eleven more were chosen from bibliographies, describing 29 unique cohorts. All but five enrolled transfusion-refractory, predominantly alloimmunized patients. Cross-match impact on mortality and hemorrhage could not be assessed from these studies. Two studies demonstrated durable corrected count increments and/or breadth of alloimmunization throughout cross-match support; none addressed development or persistence of refractoriness. In alloimmunized refractory patients and nonrefractory cohorts with greater than 25% alloimmunization, higher increments were seen with cross-match-compatible PLTs than incompatible or un-cross-matched units. In two nonrefractory, nonalloimmunized cohorts, the lack of utility of cross-match was reflected by test sensitivity of less than 20%. Comparison of cross-matched PLT success with that of HLA-identical units revealed inferior success rates for the former in one study and equivalent rates in another. No trend was observed regarding relative utility of the various commonly employed techniques. Conclusion Cross-matched PLTs are useful in increasing PLT counts in alloimmunized, transfusion-refractory HT patients, but data about their impact on hemorrhage and mortality are lacking.
机译:背景异体免疫输血难治性多次输血的增殖性血小板减少症(HT)患者需要特别选择的血小板(PLT)。交叉匹配的单采血液采血术PLT是一种流行的支持选择,它避免了需要大批键入供体的基于HLA的选择。我们对降低死亡率,预防出血,同种免疫和耐火度以及提高PLT利用率或计数增加的各种交叉匹配技术的实用性进行了系统的综述。研究设计和方法截至2012年12月,对MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行了系统评价,并对相关参考文献进行了书目检索。结果146篇被引用文献中有20篇符合纳入标准。从书目中选择了另外11个,描述了29个独特的队列。除五名入院外,其余均为输血难治性,同种免疫为主的患者。这些研究无法评估交叉比赛对死亡率和出血的影响。两项研究表明,在整个交叉比赛支持中,持续校正的计数增量和/或同种免疫的广度;没有人讨论耐火材料的发展或持久性。在同种免疫的难治性患者和同种免疫大于25%的非难治性队列中,与交叉匹配的PLT相比,交叉匹配的PLT的增量更高。在两个非难治性,非alalimmunized的队列中,交叉匹配的效用不足是因为测试灵敏度低于20%。将交叉匹配的PLT成功率与HLA相同的单元成功率进行比较,发现一项研究中前者的成功率较低,而另一项研究中的等效率较低。关于各种常用技术的相对实用性,没有观察到趋势。结论交叉匹配的PLT可用于增加同种免疫,输血难治性HT患者的PLT计数,但缺乏有关其对出血和死亡率影响的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号