...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of positive psychology >Examining explanatory mechanisms of positive and expressive writing: Towards a resource-oriented perspective
【24h】

Examining explanatory mechanisms of positive and expressive writing: Towards a resource-oriented perspective

机译:检验正面和表达性写作的解释机制:以资源为导向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study tested the hypothesis that benefits of positive and expressive writing accrue when the intervention matches or activates the participant's personal resources. Students were randomly assigned to keep a newly developed resource diary (RD, n=114), which asked the participants to write about positive experiences and personal resources, or an expressive writing diary (ED, n=114), which asked the participants to engage with negative emotional experiences, at home on three consecutive days per week for four weeks. Participants keeping the RD perceived significantly more social support and reported a significantly better mood at post-test than participants keeping the ED. Compared to a control group (n=81) treatment effects of both writing interventions were higher for participants with lower pre-test values of well-being and brooding as well as for participants who wrote in an atmosphere of activated resources.' It is suggested that research should move away from testing deficit-compensating hypotheses towards a stronger resource orientation.
机译:这项研究检验了以下假设:干预或匹配或激活参与者的个人资源时,正面和表达写作的好处就会增加。随机分配学生保留一份新近开发的资源日记(RD,n = 114),该日记要求参与者写出积极的经历和个人资源,或者一个表现力写作日记(ED,n = 114),要求参与者每周三天连续三天在家中进行负面的情感体验。保持RD的参与者比保持ED的参与者感觉到更多的社会支持,并且在测试后的心情明显好转。与对照组(n = 81)相比,两种写作干预的治疗效果对幸福感和育雏前测值较低的参与者以及在活跃的资源氛围中进行写作的参与者而言,效果都更高。建议研究应从检验赤字补偿假设转向更强的资源导向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号