首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Reduced energy intake at breakfast is not compensated for at lunch if a high-insoluble-fiber cereal replaces a low-fiber cereal.
【24h】

Reduced energy intake at breakfast is not compensated for at lunch if a high-insoluble-fiber cereal replaces a low-fiber cereal.

机译:如果高不溶性纤维谷物代替低纤维性谷物,则早餐时减少的能量摄取不能在午餐时得到补偿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In cohort studies, insoluble fiber has been associated with a reduced risk of obesity and diabetes; however, compared with soluble fiber, its role in the regulation of short-term food intake (FI) and satiety has received little attention. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the effects of a high-insoluble-fiber (HF) cereal with a low-fiber (LF) cereal on FI, subjective appetite (SA), and plasma glucose (PG) in healthy individuals. DESIGN: Males and females (n = 32) were randomly assigned to consume 60 g of either HF (26 g insoluble fiber, 120 kcal) or LF (1 g fiber, 217 kcal) breakfast cereal. Pre- and postlunch SA and PG were measured regularly for 4 h, and ad libitum FI was measured at 3 h. RESULTS: The prelunch SA area under the curve did not differ between the 2 cereals, but when expressed as change in appetite per kilocalorie of cereal, HF suppressed SA more than did LF (-17.6 +/- 1.8 compared with -10.0 +/- 1.1 mm . min . kcal(-)(1), respectively; P < 0.01). Lunchtime FI did not differ between cereals, but cumulative energy intake (cereal + lunch) was lower after the HF than after the LF cereal (1330 +/- 57 compared with 1422 +/- 66 kcal, respectively; P = 0.01). The prelunch PG area under the curve (P < 0.0001) and the immediate postlunch PG (P = 0.01) were lower after HF cereal consumption. CONCLUSIONS: An HF breakfast cereal contributes to a cumulative reduction in breakfast and lunch energy intake, possibly due to its high satiety value per kilocalorie. A short-term benefit of the HF cereal, compared with LF cereal, was lower PG concentration before and immediately after lunch.
机译:背景:在队列研究中,不溶性纤维与降低肥胖症和糖尿病的风险有关。但是,与可溶性纤维相比,其在调节短期食物摄入量和饱腹感方面的作用鲜为人知。目的:我们的目的是比较健康个体中高不溶性纤维(HF)谷物和低纤维(LF)谷物对FI,主观食欲(SA)和血浆葡萄糖(PG)的影响。设计:雄性和雌性(n = 32)被随机分配食用60克HF(26 g不溶性纤维,120 kcal)或LF(1 g纤维,217 kcal)早餐谷物。午餐前和餐后SA和PG定期测量4小时,随意FI在3小时测量。结果:曲线下的午餐前SA面积在两种谷物之间没有差异,但是当表示为每千卡路里谷物的食欲变化时,HF抑制SA的作用要比LF(-17.6 +/- 1.8,而-10.0 +/-最小为1.1 mm.kcal(-)(1); P <0.01)。谷物之间的午餐时间FI没有差异,但是HF后的累积能量摄入(谷物+午餐)低于LF谷物(分别为1330 +/- 57和1422 +/- 66 kcal; P = 0.01)。食用HF谷物后,曲线下的午餐前PG面积(P <0.0001)和午餐后立即PG(P = 0.01)较低。结论:HF早餐麦片有助于减少早餐和午餐能量的摄入,这可能是由于每千卡的饱腹感值很高。与LF谷物相比,HF谷物的短期好处是午餐前和午餐后PG浓度较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号