首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of nursing education >Comparison of expert modeling versus voice-over PowerPoint lecture and presimulation readings on novice nurses' competence of providing care to multiple patients.
【24h】

Comparison of expert modeling versus voice-over PowerPoint lecture and presimulation readings on novice nurses' competence of providing care to multiple patients.

机译:专家建模与旁白PowerPoint讲座和预模拟读物对新手护士为多名患者提供护理的能力的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Due to today's complex needs of hospitalized patients, nurses' competence and strategies to improve competence are of growing importance. Simulation is commonly used to influence competence, but little evidence exists for comparing how presimulation assignments influence competence. A randomized control trial was used to compare the efficacy of three simulation preparation methods (expert modeling/intervention, voice-over PowerPoint/active control, and reading assignments/passive control) on improving competence for providing care to multiple patients among senior undergraduate novice nurses. Competence was measured at two time points (baseline and following a 5-week intervention) by two blinded raters using the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument. Twenty novice nurses participated in the trial. No significant differences were noted in raw improvements in competence among the three groups, but the expert modeling (Cohen's d=0.413) and voice-over PowerPoint methods (Cohen's d=0.226) resulted in greater improvements in competence, compared with the passive control.
机译:由于当今住院患者的复杂需求,护士的能力和提高能力的策略变得越来越重要。仿真通常用于影响能力,但是很少有证据可以用来比较预仿真分配如何影响能力。一项随机对照试验用于比较三种模拟准备方法(专家建模/干预,画外音PowerPoint /主动控制和阅读作业/被动控制)在提高高级本科新手护士为多名患者提供护理的能力方面的功效。 。两名盲人使用Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument在两个时间点(基线和进行5周干预后)测量了能力。 20名新护士参加了试验。两组之间在能力方面的原始改进没有显着差异,但是与被动控制相比,专家建模(Cohen d = 0.413)和旁白PowerPoint方法(Cohen d = 0.226)导致能力上的更大改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号