...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences >Evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for carbohydrate and protein fractions by CNCP system.
【24h】

Evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for carbohydrate and protein fractions by CNCP system.

机译:通过CNCP系统评估热带饲料中的碳水化合物和蛋白质组分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seventeen feed ingredients comprising protein sources (linseed cake-LSC, mustard seed cake-MSC, cotton seed cake-CSC, soybean cake-SBC and groundnut cake-GNC), energy sources (deoiled rice bran-DORB, maize grain-MG, barley grain-BG and wheat bran-WB), legume roughages (berseem, cowpea hay-CH, Stylosanthes hamata-SH and Acacia catechu-AC) and non-legume roughages (ammoniated wheat straw-AWS, guinea grass-GG maize fodder-MF and sorghum fodder-SF) were evaluated for carbohydrate and nitrogen fractions as well as mineral contents. In CNCP system, crude protein content of feed is partitioned into 5 fractions (A, B1, B2, B3 and C) and carbohydrate into 4 fractions (A, B1, B2 and C) according to degradation rates. The proximate composition, cell wall constituents, carbohydrate and nitrogen fractions of different feeds vary significantly amongst the groups. The CHO, CNSC, CB1, and Cc fractions of carbohydrate were higher in energy, while CA and CB2 fraction of CHO were more in protein sources. Total CHO and CB2 fraction of carbohydrates were more in non-legume while CA, CNSC and Cc fractions were higher in legume roughages. Amongst the studied feedstuffs PA and PB fractions of protein were higher in protein sources, while PB2, PB3 and PC fractions were higher in energy sources. Legumes exhibited higher contents of PB2, while non-legume had higher PA, PB1 and PB3 fraction of protein. Concentration of macro (%) and micro minerals (ppm) of feed stuffs differed across feeds (energy and protein) and roughages (legumes and non legumes). It is concluded from the present study that feedstuffs chemical properties for carbohydrate and nitrogen fractions are unique and different. Therefore feed ingredients selection based on CNCPS evaluation will be more logical for formulating efficient diets for livestock.
机译:十七种饲料原料,包括蛋白质来源(亚麻籽饼-LSC,芥菜籽饼-MSC,棉籽饼-CSC,大豆饼-SBC和花生饼-GNC),能源(脱水米糠-DORB,玉米粒-MG,大麦)谷物-BG和麦麸-WB),豆类粗饲料(berseem,cow豆干草-CH,Sylosanthes hamata -SH和 Acacia catechu -AC)和非豆类粗饲料(对氨化小麦秸秆(AWS),豚草(GG)玉米饲料(MF)和高粱饲料(SF)的碳水化合物和氮含量以及矿物质含量进行了评估。在CNCP系统中,饲料的粗蛋白含量分为5个部分(A,B 1 ,B 2 ,B 3 和C),并且根据降解速率将碳水化合物分为4个部分(A,B 1 ,B 2 和C)。在不同组别中,不同饲料的最接近组成,细胞壁成分,碳水化合物和氮含量差异很大。碳水化合物的CHO,C NSC ,C B1 和Cc馏分能量较高,而C A 和C B2 < CHO的/ sub>部分更多来自蛋白质来源。非豆科植物中碳水化合物的总CHO和C B2 部分较高,而豆科植物粗饲料中的C A ,C NSC 和Cc部分较高。在所研究的饲料中,蛋白质来源的蛋白质P A 和P B 部分较高,而P B2 ,P B3 和P C 分数较高。豆类表现出较高的P B2 含量,而非豆类表现出较高的P A ,P B1 和P B3 蛋白质的一部分。不同饲料(能量和蛋白质)和粗饲料(豆类和非豆类)中饲料原料的宏量(%)和微量矿物质(ppm)的浓度不同。从本研究得出的结论是,饲料中碳水化合物和氮成分的化学性质是独特且不同的。因此,基于CNCPS评估选择饲料成分将对制定牲畜有效日粮更加合乎逻辑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号