...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultramicroscopy >Accurate measurement of Atomic Force Microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration
【24h】

Accurate measurement of Atomic Force Microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration

机译:精确测量原子力显微镜悬臂偏转,不包括尖端表面接触,可用于力校准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Considerable attention has been given to the calibration of AFM cantilever spring constants in the last 20 years. Techniques that do not require tip-sample contact are considered advantageous since the imaging tip is not at risk of being damaged. Far less attention has been directed toward measuring the cantilever deflection or sensitivity, despite the fact that the primary means of determining this factor relies on the AFM tip being pressed against a hard surface, such as silicon or sapphire; which has the potential to significantly damage the tip. A recent method developed by Tourek et al. in 2010 involves deflecting the AFM cantilever a known distance from the imaging tip by pressing the cantilever against a sharpened tungsten wire. In this work a similar yet more precise method is described, whereby the deflection of the cantilever is achieved using an AFM probe with a spring constant much larger than the test cantilever, essentially a rigid cantilever. The exact position of loading on the test cantilever was determined by reverse AFM imaging small spatial markers that are milled into the test cantilever using a focussed ion beam. For V shaped cantilevers it is possible to reverse image the arm intersection in order to determine the exact loading point without necessarily requiring FIB milled spatial markers, albeit at the potential cost of additional uncertainty. The technique is applied to tip-less, beam shaped and V shaped cantilevers and compared to the hard surface contact technique with very good agreement (on average less than 5% difference). While the agreement with the hard surface contact technique was very good the error on the technique is dependent upon the assumptions inherent in the method, such as cantilever shape, loading point distance and ratio of test to rigid cantilever spring constants. The average error ranged between 2 to 5% for the majority of test cantilevers studied. The sensitivity derived with this technique can then be used to calibrate the cantilever spring constant using the thermal noise method, allowing complete force calibration to be accurately performed without tip-sample contact.
机译:在过去的20年中,已经对AFM悬臂弹簧常数的校准给予了极大的关注。不需要尖端样本接触的技术被认为是有利的,因为成像尖端没有被损坏的风险。尽管确定该因子的主要方法取决于将AFM尖端压在坚硬的表面(例如硅或蓝宝石)上,但对测量悬臂的挠度或灵敏度的关注却很少。可能会严重损坏烙铁头。 Tourek等人开发的最新方法。在2010年,我们将AFM悬臂从尖锐的钨丝上压下,使其与成像末端偏离已知距离。在这项工作中,描述了一种类似但更精确的方法,其中,使用AFM探针可实现悬臂的挠度,该探针的弹簧常数远大于测试悬臂,基本上是刚性悬臂。加载在测试悬臂上的确切位置是通过反向AFM成像的小型空间标记确定的,这些小空间标记使用聚焦离子束研磨成测试悬臂。对于V形悬臂,可以倒转手臂交叉点,以便确定确切的装载点,而无需FIB铣削空间标记,尽管这可能会带来额外不确定性。该技术适用于无尖,梁形和V形悬臂,并且与硬表面接触技术相比具有很好的一致性(平均相差小于5%)。尽管与硬表面接触技术的一致性非常好,但是该技术的误差取决于该方法固有的假设,例如悬臂形状,加载点距离以及试验与刚性悬臂弹簧常数的比率。对于所研究的大多数测试悬臂,平均误差在2%至5%之间。然后,可以使用这种技术得出的灵敏度通过热噪声方法用于校准悬臂弹簧常数,从而可以在不与尖端样品接触的情况下准确地进行完整的力校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号