首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >A Comparison of efl Teachers’ Perceptions of Language Learning Strategies (LLSS) and Learners’ Reported Use of Llss in Their English Language Classes
【24h】

A Comparison of efl Teachers’ Perceptions of Language Learning Strategies (LLSS) and Learners’ Reported Use of Llss in Their English Language Classes

机译:efl老师对语言学习策略(LLSS)的理解与学习者报告的英语课中对语言学习的使用的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In the present study, the variables in the rating provided below in combination with Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and a semi-structured interview were used in order to examine the perspectives of EFL teachers working at a private university in Turkey on incorporating language learning strategies in their lessons. With the help of the variables developed by MacIntyre (1994), the researcher investigated the awareness levels of the EFL teachers, their beliefs on the effectiveness of strategies on language learning and perceived ease of strategy instruction. These results were compared with the students’ reported use of LLSs to increase our awareness of students’ strategy use and needs so that teachers would be able to help learners facing problems in learning English. This study employed both qualitative and quantitative research tools. A total of 70 teachers teaching at the English language department of a private university and 100 students studying in the same department were involved in the study. Data collected from the questionnaire were analyzed quantitatively by employing descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Content analysis was performed to analyze the interview data.The results of the study suggest that for most of the items in the strategy inventory, if the teachers are aware of learning strategies, believe in the effectiveness of LLSs instruction and find them easy to apply in the classroom, they may use them more often in their classes. Finally, when the teachers’ and students’ frequency of LLSs use was compared, it was found out that teachers reported a higher frequency of LLSs use than their learners. However, there was a great similarity between the two parties in terms of frequency of strategy use in the most and least preferred strategy categories. It is essential to find the reasons for the difference in the frequency of LLSs among the two parties before planning a LLSs training.
机译:在本研究中,下面提供的评分变量与牛津大学(1990)语言学习策略清单(SILL)和半结构化访谈相结合,用于检验在EFL私立大学工作的EFL教师的观点。土耳其将语言学习策略纳入课程。借助MacIntyre(1994)开发的变量,研究人员调查了EFL教师的意识水平,他们对语言学习策略的有效性的信念以及策略教学的易感性。将这些结果与学生报告的使用LLS的方法进行了比较,以提高我们对学生的策略用途和需求的认识,以便教师能够帮助学习者在学习英语时遇到问题。这项研究采用了定性和定量研究工具。一所私立大学的英语系共有70名教师在教学,同一系的100名学生参加了这项研究。通过使用描述性统计数据(例如频率,百分比,均值和标准偏差)对从调查表收集的数据进行定量分析。进行了内容分析以分析访谈数据。研究结果表明,对于策略清单中的大多数项目,如果教师知道学习策略,则相信LLSs教学的有效性并发现它们易于在学习中应用。在课堂上,他们可能会在课堂上更频繁地使用它们。最后,在比较教师和学生使用LLS的频率时,发现教师报告的使用LLS的频率高于学习者。但是,在最优先和最不喜欢的策略类别中,在策略使用频率方面,双方之间存在很大的相似性。在计划一次LLS培训之前,必须找出导致双方LLS频率差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号