...
首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >Subgroups of adult basic education learners with different profiles of reading skills
【24h】

Subgroups of adult basic education learners with different profiles of reading skills

机译:具有不同阅读能力特征的成人基础教育学习者亚组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of adult basic education (ABE) learners with different profiles of skills in the core reading components of decoding, word recognition, spelling, fluency, and comprehension. The analysis uses factor scores of those 5 reading components from on a prior investigation of the reliability and construct validity of measures of reading component skills (MacArthur, Konold, Glutting, & Alamprese, 2010). In that investigation, confirmatory factor analysis found that a model with those 5 factors fit the data best and fit equally well for native and non-native English speakers. The study included 486 students, 334 born or educated in the United States (native) and 152 not born nor educated in the US (non-native) but who spoke English well enough to participate in English reading classes. The cluster analysis found an 8-cluster solution with good internal cohesion, external isolation, and replicability across subsamples. Of the 8 subgroups, 4 had relatively flat profiles (range of mean scores across factors 0.5 SD), 2 had higher comprehension than decoding, and 2 had higher decoding than comprehension. Profiles were consistent with expectations regarding demographic factors. Non-native speakers were overrepresented in subgroups with relatively higher decoding and underrepresented in subgroups with relatively higher comprehension. Adults with self-reported learning disabilities were overrepresented in the lowest performing subgroup. Older adults and men were overrepresented in subgroups with lower performance. The study adds to the limited research on the reading skills of ABE learners and, from the perspective of practice, supports the importance of assessing component skills to plan instruction.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定在解码,单词识别,拼写,流利度和理解力等核心阅读成分中具有不同技能配置的成人基础教育(ABE)学习者的亚组。该分析使用了对这5个阅读成分的因子得分,这些因素来自对阅读成分技能的信度和建构效度的先前调查(MacArthur,Konold,Glutting和Alamprese,2010)。在该调查中,验证性因素分析发现,具有这5个因素的模型最适合数据,并且对于母语为英语和非母语的英语者同样适用。该研究包括486名学生,其中334名在美国出生或受过教育(本地),另有152名未在美国出生或未受过教育(非本地),但他们的英语水平足以参加英语阅读课。聚类分析发现了一种8聚类解决方案,该解决方案具有良好的内部凝聚力,外部隔离性和跨子样本的可重复性。在这8个子组中,有4个具有相对平坦的配置文件(跨因子<0.5 SD的平均得分范围),其中2个具有比解码更高的理解力,而2个具有比理解更高的解码力。概况与对人口因素的期望一致。非母语说话者在解码相对较高的子组中代表过多,而在理解相对较高的子组中的代表不足。具有自我报告的学习障碍的成年人在表现最差的亚组中人数过多。老年人和男性在表现较差的亚组中人数过多。该研究增加了对ABE学习者阅读技能的有限研究,并且从实践的角度来看,支持评估组成技能以计划教学的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号