首页> 外文期刊>Professional Development in Education >Knowledge sources and autonomy: German and Swedish teachers’ continuing professional development of assessment knowledge
【24h】

Knowledge sources and autonomy: German and Swedish teachers’ continuing professional development of assessment knowledge

机译:知识来源和自主权:德语和瑞典语教师继续专业评估知识的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article presents a comparative study of German and Swedish teachers’ continuing professional development (CPD) in relation to student assessment. It investigates the sources teachers use to improve their knowledge about assessment and the relationship this has to different national contexts. Assessment, as well as evaluation, defines what counts as valid knowledge and how this can be measured. As such, assessment is a major focus of teaching and specifies constraints and possibilities for teacher practice in the classroom. Teachers are seen as agents in a regulated CPD marketplace, and within this framework teachers make decisions about the knowledge sources they use to educate themselves about assessment. These choices can be seen as expressions of what they perceive as important and relevant in relation to assessment. We argue that this expression of opinion can contribute to an understanding of teachers’ professional autonomy, especially in relation to their decisions about a crucial aspect of their profession. In this way, we propose a way to conceptualize the impact of the national context on teachers’ CPD.View full textDownload full textKeywordsteacher, assessment, continuing professional development, autonomy, comparative education, knowledge sources, Germany, SwedenRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.694369
机译:本文对德国和瑞典教师在学生评估方面的持续专业发展(CPD)进行了比较研究。它调查了教师用来提高他们对评估的知识以及与不同国家背景之间的关系的来源。评估以及评估定义了什么才算是有效知识以及如何对其进行衡量。因此,评估是教学的主要重点,并规定了教师在课堂上练习的限制和可能性。在受监管的CPD市场中,教师被视为代理人,并且在此框架内,教师可以决定他们用于教育自己的评估知识的知识来源。这些选择可以看作是他们认为与评估有关的重要和相关的表达。我们认为,这种观点表达可以促进对教师专业自主性的理解,特别是与他们对职业关键方面的决定有关。通过这种方式,我们提出了一种概念化方法,以概念化国家背景对教师CPD的影响。查看全文下载全文关键字教师,评估,持续专业发展,自主性,比较教育,知识来源,德国,瑞典相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.694369

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号