首页> 外文期刊>Language, culture and curriculum >A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning - mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making
【24h】

A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning - mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making

机译:内容和语言整合学习的多语言方法-映射学习者在知识建构和意义创造中的进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the past decades content and language integrated learning (CLIL) research has predominantly focused on the language proficiency of CLIL learners. The results are very promising and show that working language skills in learners, especially reading and listening skills, can be improved through a CLIL programme. Studies focusing on subject learners are still few but they indicate that learners maintain or under certain conditions can improve their subject learning when compared to learners learning in L1. However, more recent studies have raised challenging questions concerning academic language competence which indicate that CLIL instruction may not be reaching its full potential. Unravelling the integrated approach and the inherent interrelationship of using language for progressing knowledge construction and meaning-making needs to be addressed, drawing together linguistic and pedagogic theoretical underpinnings. This article posits that CLIL can pragmatically address the growing educational malaise of functional illiteracy. We reason that progression along the knowledge pathway towards deeper subject understanding requires a greater command of secondary discourse, and mastery of subject-specific literacies. In traditional classrooms, content teachers do not usually focus on the quality of learners' disciplinary literacy and discourse. In language classrooms, subject-specific literacies are considered irrelevant. We suggest that if 'literacy' were at the centre of the learning agenda, regardless of subject disciplines, a fundamental shift towards deeper learning would occur. Therefore, the article addresses two fundamental issues: (i) the role of subject-specific or disciplinary literacies in CLIL and (ii) the iteration of a model building on the existing 4Cs framework, which maps literacy and language progression in CLIL contexts and serves as a guide for evolving classroom practices.
机译:在过去的几十年中,内容和语言集成学习(CLIL)研究主要集中在CLIL学习者的语言能力上。结果非常令人鼓舞,表明通过CLIL计划可以提高学习者的工作语言技能,尤其是阅读和听力技能。专注于主题学习者的研究仍然很少,但它们表明与L1学习者相比,学习者保持或在一定条件下可以改善他们的主题学习。但是,最近的研究提出了有关学术语言能力的具有挑战性的问题,这些问题表明CLIL教学可能没有充分发挥其潜力。需要探讨综合方法和使用语言进行知识构建和意义发展的内在相互关系,将语言学和教学学的理论基础放在一起。本文认为,CLIL可以务实地解决功能性文盲问题日益严重的教育问题。我们认为,沿着知识路径向更深层次的学科理解发展需要对第二语言有更大的要求,并需要掌握特定学科的知识。在传统的教室里,内容丰富的老师通常不注重学习者的学科素养和话语质量。在语言教室中,特定学科的知识被认为是无关紧要的。我们建议,如果“扫盲”是学习议程的中心,无论学科领域如何,都将发生向深度学习的根本转变。因此,本文解决了两个基本问题:(i)特定学科或学科文学在CLIL中的作用,以及(ii)基于现有4C框架的模型的迭代,该模型在CLIL上下文中映射了素养和语言发展并提供服务作为不断发展的课堂实践的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号