首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in science teaching >Comparing Three Online Testing Modalities: Using Static, Active, and Interactive Online Testing Modalities to Assess Middle School Students' Understanding of Fundamental Ideas and Use of Inquiry Skills Related to Ecosystems
【24h】

Comparing Three Online Testing Modalities: Using Static, Active, and Interactive Online Testing Modalities to Assess Middle School Students' Understanding of Fundamental Ideas and Use of Inquiry Skills Related to Ecosystems

机译:比较三种在线测试方式:使用静态,主动和交互式在线测试方式评估中学生对基本思想的理解以及与生态系统相关的询问技能的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Online testing holds much promise for assessing students' complex science knowledge and inquiry skills. In the current study, we examined the comparative effectiveness of assessment tasks and test items presented in online modules that used either a static, active, or interactive modality. A total of 1,836 students from the classrooms of 22 middle school science teachers in 12 states participated in the study as part of normal classroom activities. Students took assessments in the three different modalities on three consecutive days. The assessments tested key concepts about ecosystems and students' ability to use inquiry skills in an ecosystems context. Our in-depth analyses focused on how the different modalities elicited specific content knowledge of ecosystems (e.g., producers, consumers, predator-prey relationships) and specific inquiry skills (e.g., designing and interpreting experiments). We also investigated student use of technology supports, such as replaying animations or inspecting graphs. The results showed that the interactive modality enabled the testing of more complex reasoning and that additional experience working in the online environment improved student performance for all the modalities, especially for the interactive modality. Each of the three modalities provided useful information about students' understanding of ecosystems and related inquiry skills as well as their misconceptions. The study begins to build a knowledge base of what types of science knowledge and skills may be effectively measured in three different modalities of online assessment.
机译:在线测试对于评估学生的复杂科学知识和探究技能很有希望。在当前的研究中,我们检查了使用静态,主动或交互方式的在线模块中提供的评估任务和测试项目的相对有效性。来自12个州的22名中学理科教师的教室共有1,836名学生参加了此项研究,这是正常课堂活动的一部分。学生连续三天以三种不同的方式进行评估。评估测试了有关生态系统的关键概念以及学生在生态系统环境中使用查询技能的能力。我们的深入分析着眼于不同的方式如何引发生态系统的特定内容知识(例如生产者,消费者,捕食者与猎物之间的关系)和特定的查询技巧(例如设计和解释实验)。我们还调查了学生对技术支持的使用情况,例如重播动画或检查图形。结果表明,交互式模式可以测试更复杂的推理,并且在在线环境中工作的更多经验可以提高学生在所有模式下的表现,尤其是交互式模式。三种方式中的每一种都提供了有关学生对生态系统的理解和相关查询技能以及他们的误解的有用信息。该研究开始建立一个知识库,以三种在线评估方式可以有效地衡量哪些类型的科学知识和技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号