...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in science teaching >Comparing the preparedness, content knowledge, and instructional quality of elementary science specialists and self-contained teachers
【24h】

Comparing the preparedness, content knowledge, and instructional quality of elementary science specialists and self-contained teachers

机译:比较基础科学专家和自给自足的教师的准备程度,内容知识和教学质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, we report on the results of a study comparing the preparedness, content knowledge, and instructional practices of elementary science specialist (ESS) teachers with those of a matched sample of self-contained elementary teachers. Analysis of survey data collected for the two groups indicated that ESS teachers were more likely than self-contained teachers to hold science content degrees. ESS teachers scored significantly higher than self-contained teachers on self-reported measures of the following: preparedness to teach science and engineering content; familiarity with science standards; knowledge of students' strengths and weaknesses in science, having enough time to meet students' needs in science and having enough time to plan for all the subject areas that they teach. ESS teachers also scored significantly higher than self-contained teachers on selected measures of science content knowledge. Finally, in comparison to self-contained teachers, some elements of ESS teachers' science lessons were better aligned with our chosen framework for quality elementary science instruction. Regression analyses suggested that these differences in quality of science lessons could be predicted based on the different amounts of time that ESS and self-contained teachers are respectively afforded for planning and teaching science. Implications are provided for future research into elementary science specialization as well as professional development support for all teachers of elementary science. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 10: 1302-1321, 2017
机译:在本文中,我们报告了一项研究结果,该研究比较了基础科学专家(ESS)教师的自备能力,内容知识和教学实践,以及与之匹配的自包含基础教师的样本。两组调查数据的分析表明,ESS教师比独立教师拥有科学学位的可能性更高。在以下方面的自我报告指标上,ESS教师的得分显着高于独立教师。熟悉科学标准;了解学生在科学方面的优势和劣势,有足够的时间来满足学生在科学方面的需求,并有足够的时间来计划他们所教授的所有学科领域。 ESS教师在科学内容知识的某些选定指标上的得分也明显高于独立教师。最后,与自给自足的教师相比,ESS教师科学课程的某些要素与我们选择的优质基础科学教学框架更好地吻合。回归分析表明,可以根据ESS和自给教师分别为计划科学和教学提供的时间不同来预测科学课质量的这些差异。提供了对基础科学专业的未来研究以及对所有基础科学教师的专业发展支持的启示。 (c)2017威利期刊公司J Res Sci Teach 10:1302-1321,2017

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号