首页> 外文会议>Physics Education Research Conference >Is Inquiry-Based Instruction Good for Elementary Teaching Majors? The Effects on Chemistry Content Knowledge and Views About Teaching and Learning Science
【24h】

Is Inquiry-Based Instruction Good for Elementary Teaching Majors? The Effects on Chemistry Content Knowledge and Views About Teaching and Learning Science

机译:是基于询问的教学,适用于小学教学专业吗?对教学和学习科学的化学内容知识和观点的影响

获取原文

摘要

Although science educators have advocated that elementary teaching majors learn science concepts using inquiry-based methods, many college professors believe that these courses are merely “watered down” versions of traditional lecture-based courses. This study compared the chemistry content knowledge of elementary teaching majors enrolled in an inquiry-based course and science majors enrolled in traditional lecture-based courses. It also compared the elementary teaching majors' views of how science is taught and learned to the views of secondary science teaching majors. The elementary teaching majors developed chemistry content knowledge comparable to the students enrolled in the traditional lecture-based course, but they developed views regarding how science is taught and learned that were more in line with the constructivist ideals than the secondary science teaching majors. The elementary teaching majors also improved their interest and confidence in teaching science in the elementary school setting. These results suggest that both sets of teaching majors would benefit more from inquiry-based science courses than lecture-based courses.
机译:虽然科学教育工作者主张了使用基于探究的方法学习科学概念,但许多大学教授认为这些课程仅仅是“淡化”的传统讲座的课程。本研究比较了招募课程课程课程的基本教学专业的化学内容知识和招收到传统讲座的课程。它还比较了科学专业的看法,了解科学的教导和学会了中学教学专业的观点。小学教学专业发展与参加传统讲座课程的学生开发了化学内容知识,但他们对科学的教导和学习的观点表达了看法,并学会了更多与建构主义的理想,而不是二级科学教学专业。小学教学专业也提高了对小学环境教学的兴趣和信心。这些结果表明,两组教学专业从基于查询的科学课程都会受益于基于讲座的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号