首页> 外文期刊>International tax and public finance >Education and social mobility
【24h】

Education and social mobility

机译:教育与社会流动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper shows that the design of education policy involves a potential conflict between welfare and social mobility. We consider a setting in which social mobility is maximized under the least elitist public education system, whereas welfare maximization calls for the most elitist system. We show that when private education is available, the degree of elitism that maximizes social mobility increases, while the welfare-maximizing degree of elitism decreases. The ranking between the welfare- and mobility-maximizing degrees of elitism may even be reversed. Utilitarian welfare is always higher when private supplementary education is available, but social mobility may be reduced.
机译:本文表明,教育政策的设计涉及福利与社会流动性之间的潜在冲突。我们考虑的环境是,在精英程度最低的公共教育体系下,社会流动性得到了最大化,而福利最大化要求了精英地位最高的体系。我们表明,当提供私立教育时,使社会流动最大化的精英化程度会提高,而使福利最大化的精英化程度会降低。福利最大化和流动性最大化之间的排名甚至可以颠倒。当有私人补充教育时,功利福利始终较高,但社会流动性可能会降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International tax and public finance》 |2010年第4期|p.357-377|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Toulouse School of Economics (GREMAQ, IDEI and Institut universitaire de France), 21 allee de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France;

    rnToulouse School of Economics (GREMAQ-CNRS and IDEI), 21 allee de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France;

    rnCREPP, HEC-Management School University of Liege, 7, Bd. Rectorat, Liege 4000, Belgium CORE Universite catholique de Louvain, PSE and CEPR, 34, voie du Roman Pays, Louvain la Neuve, 1348, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    elitism; egalitarianism; private education;

    机译:精英主义平均主义;私立教育;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号