首页> 外文期刊>Interactive Learning Environments >The rhetoric and reality of technology-enhanced learning developments in UK higher education: reflections on recent UCISA research findings (2012-2016)
【24h】

The rhetoric and reality of technology-enhanced learning developments in UK higher education: reflections on recent UCISA research findings (2012-2016)

机译:英国高等教育中技术增强型学习发展的言论和现实:对UCISA最新研究成果的反思(2012-2016)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reviews the investment that UK higher education institutions have made in technology-enhanced learning (TEL) services in recent years, and considers the impact this has had on academic practice. Drawing on UCISA survey and case study research, our analysis shows that whilst the range of centrally supported TEL tools and services in support of teaching and learning has increased across the sector, evidence of transformational change in pedagogic practice through their use has been harder to discern. We observe an increasing number of TEL systems that instructors are being encouraged to engage with as part of their academic practice; however, there have been limited changes in the mode of course delivery, with content-focused and supplementary uses of the web still very much in vogue. The evidence suggests a gap between the institutional rhetoric on TEL developments and the reality of academic practice across the sector. Using Barnett's conditions of flexibility as a frame of reference [Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility: Securing a more responsive higher education system. York: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/conditions_of_flexibility_securing_a_more_responsive_higher_education_system.pdf], the article discusses the factors behind this mismatch, exploring how a balanced institutional focus on service development and academic support may be needed to foster transformative and sustainable changes in the way that TEL tools are employed in course design and delivery.
机译:本文回顾了近年来英国高等教育机构对技术增强学习(TEL)服务的投资,并考虑了这对学术实践的影响。借助UCISA调查和案例研究,我们的分析表明,尽管在整个行业中,用于支持教学的中央支持的TEL工具和服务的范围有所增加,但通过使用它们,教学实践发生了变革性变化的证据更加难以辨别。 。我们发现,越来越多的TEL系统被鼓励与教师互动,这是他们学术实践的一部分。但是,课程的授课方式变化有限,以内容为中心和补充使用网络仍然非常流行。证据表明,有关电话发展的机构言论与整个行业的学术实践之间存在差距。使用Barnett的灵活性条件作为参考框架[Barnett,R.(2014)。灵活性的条件:确保响应速度更快的高等教育系统。约克:高等教育学院。摘自https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/conditions_of_flexibility_securing_a_more_sensitive_higher_education_system.pdf],本文讨论了这种失配的背后因素,探讨了如何可能需要平衡的机构重点关注服务开发和学术支持以促进变革以及在课程设计和授课中采用TEL工具的方式的可持续变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号