...
首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education >Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education
【24h】

Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education

机译:在美国高等教育背景下解开精英管理神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Framed by historical and contemporary discussions, this article reviews the principal foundations of meritocracy and uses the public University of California system as a point of departure for examining the connection between meritocracy and higher education within the context of the United States. Through consideration of four dimensions that inform the concept of meritocracy—merit, distributive justice, equality of opportunity, and social mobility—this review examines the underlying tenets of meritocracy to better understand how higher education functions within it. In The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Daniel Bell (1973) suggested that higher education would become a “defensive necessity.” However, if colleges and universities are to serve as instruments for creating and expanding opportunity, then higher education must be more profound than simply being reduced to “defensive necessity,” and it is important for researchers to examine more closely the theoretical concerns of meritocracy and the higher education implications.
机译:在历史和当代讨论的框架下,本文回顾了精英管理的主要基础,并以加利福尼亚大学的公立大学为出发点,研究了美国背景下精英管理与高等教育之间的联系。通过考察构成精英管理概念的四个维度(功绩,分配正义,机会均等和社会流动),本次审查研究了精英管理的基本原则,以更好地了解高等教育在其中的作用。在后工业社会的到来中,丹尼尔·贝尔(Daniel Bell,1973)提出,高等教育将成为“防御性必需品”。但是,如果要用大学作为创造和扩大机会的工具,那么高等教育必须比仅仅沦为“防御性必需品”更为深刻,而且对于研究人员来说,更深入地研究精英管理和人才培养的理论问题很重要。对高等教育的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号