...
首页> 外文期刊>European management journal >A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair
【24h】

A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair

机译:战略行动领域对组织信任修复的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While the extant literature on organizational trust repair has considered the agency and trust repair actions of individual organizations, it has neglected repair following trust-damaging events affecting specific industries. Drawing on the theory of strategic action fields we ask two research questions: (1) How do reputational scandals involving a few transgressing firms affect trust in the whole institutional field? (2) Do the transgressing firms repair trust in the same way as the blameless ones in the same field? To answer these questions we investigated four cases of retail organizations that engaged in trust repair actions following a food safety scandal, two widely held to have transgressed, and two that were held to be relatively blameless. We compared the trust repair strategies of both groups, finding that even the blameless organizations felt compelled to act to repair trust. However, blameless organizations also sought to differentiate themselves from the transgressing ones by using specific strategies to restore trust. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:尽管有关组织信任修复的现有文献已经考虑了单个组织的代理和信任修复行为,但它忽略了影响特定行业的破坏信任事件之后的修复。根据战略行动领域的理论,我们提出两个研究问题:(1)涉及少数违规公司的声誉丑闻如何影响整个机构领域的信任? (2)违规的公司是否以与同一领域的无责的公司相同的方式修复信托?为了回答这些问题,我们调查了四起零售组织的案例,这些案例发生在食品安全丑闻之后,采取了信托修复行动,其中两起被广泛认为已经过犯,另外两起被认为相对无罪。我们比较了两组的信任修复策略,发现即使是无罪的组织也被迫采取行动来修复信任。但是,无责的组织还试图通过使用特定的策略来恢复信任,从而将自己与违规的组织区分开。 (C)2018由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号