首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >ECS Position Paper on the Opinion of the Advocate General in the Case HP Belgium v Reprobel before the Court of Justice of the EU
【24h】

ECS Position Paper on the Opinion of the Advocate General in the Case HP Belgium v Reprobel before the Court of Justice of the EU

机译:ECS关于在欧盟法院对HP Belgium诉Reprobel一案中的辩护人意见的立场文件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 11 June 2015, A.G. Pedro Cruz Villalon delivered his Opinion in the HP Belgium v Reprobel case then pending before the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). The Advocate General's Opinion and the underlying case raise one important issue: is it permissible for a national copyright law to allocate a portion of the fair compensation for reproductions exempted under art.5(2)(a) and (b) of the 2001/29 Infosoc Directive directly to publishers, although they are not listed among the initial holders of the reproduction right under art.2 of the Infosoc Directive? As a group of academics concerned about the copyright reforms envisaged in the EU as well as by the interpretation and development of the law by the CJEU, the European Copyright Society (ECS) takes this opportunity to share its view on this matter of principle.
机译:2015年6月11日,A.G。Pedro Cruz Villalon在HP Belgium v​​ Reprobel案中发表了自己的意见,此案尚待欧盟法院(CJEU)审理。辩护律师的意见和相关案件提出了一个重要问题:国家版权法是否允许为2001/2002年第5(2)(a)和(b)条所豁免的复制品分配一部分公平的补偿? 29 Infosoc指令直接面向发行人,尽管根据Infosoc指令第2条未将其列入复制权的最初持有人之列?作为一群关注欧盟设想的版权改革以及欧洲法院解释和发展法律的学者,欧洲版权协会(ECS)借此机会就这一原则问题发表了自己的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号